Agenda - 07-08-1982 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

DRAFT Williams and the proposed Midway airport were wrong and- that Eher siteseuld be preferable. Cannity submitted two letters from Peloquin Associates for the Boards' infor- mation. Whitted submitted letters from Martha and John Harris, Fischer family and Robert Fischer. The public hearing on Midway Airport adjourned at 10:25. The record of the public hearing would remain open for submittal of the referenced items given as evidence. Crawford requested that the public hearing remain open for the Board to question Bruce Mathews and asked the staff to request his presence at the July 19 Planning Board meeting. The Board of County Commissioners would also be pre- sent for this matter. Wil]-hoit moved adjournment of the public hearing. Marshall seconded. Motion passed unaninously. Agenda Item B. Rezoning Request fran Fred and Plieabeth Cates (Fran R1 to RS) Cannity presented a description of the proposal and its location. He explained the intent of the provision of districts in the Zoning Ordinance. He noted that the proposal in conformance with the Land Use Plan, but that there would be adverse impacts of the Peoposal, R8 rezoning. Cannity added that a rezon- ing cannot address the follcwing concerns; fire protection, recreational facilities, central services, pedestrian circulation, interior ciruclation, parking, building to building setback and an overall development plan to assure adequate services and access to the remainder of the tract. The staff recur denial of the, rezoning request. John McAdams, consultant to the developer, indicated this was a request to rezone four acres adjacent to the existing RS development of Cates Farm. He noted that the developeemeLees caught under the enforcement of the revised Zoning Ordinance and that the rezoning request would enable the continuance of the development according to the original plan for 32 units using the same vehicular access as the existing 48 units. McAdams addressed the staff comment regarding the proposal. He indicated that it was the intent of the developer to provide recreational facilities and that trash removal an(fire protection would be provided in the same manner as established for the firet 48 units. He emphasized that the existing development provides the knowledge of the standard and that 80 units would provide for the feasibility of recreation nanagement and maintenance as intended and orginally conceived and planned. Kizer asked whether the roads weuld be paved. McAdam responded that there would be surface treatment of the road commonly referred to a "macadam". Willhoit inquired about the commitment of the 'Down to water and sewer pro- vision. McAdams indicated the Sewn was willing to extend lines sized for this purpose fran the orginal 48 units. Willhoit asked if the Town's commitment was documented. Cannity responded negatively. Willhoit emphasized the importance of the availability of services. VeAdams stated that it was the tap charge not the availability of services which was in question. He explained that under a 1973-74 agreement regarding lines to Grady Brown School there is a surcharge of $200.00 per tab collected by the Town and for- warded to the Orange County School Board. The issue in this matter is the