Browse
Search
Agenda - 07-08-1982
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1982
>
Agenda - 07-08-1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2017 3:30:02 PM
Creation date
4/3/2017 3:17:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
7/8/1982
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
170
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT _ - <br /> _ - <br /> Northern indicated the developer planned -to charge maintenance and con- <br /> daminum fees. <br /> Crawford inquired what financing structure would be used: monthly leases, <br /> owner associations or sales of hangars. Northern responded the developer <br /> did not want to lock himself into a financing structures as it would <br /> depend on market opportunity and response. He added that buyers needed <br /> to be convinced that this is a viable project. <br /> Gustaveson asked if one option would be condomithm 4ages. Northern responded <br /> that likely there would be fee simple sale of hangar space with candominum <br /> like documents for maintenance and enforcement. <br /> Gustaveson inquired about projected operational costs. Northern responded <br /> he did not know that information. <br /> Cannity indicated to the Board that copies of Plentl's tater to Polatty dated <br /> July, 1982 were not introduced by staff because this was Pientl's opinion <br /> of the Zoning Ordinance and not evident/tn. He distributed copies of the <br /> letter. Whiffed noted Meyer has introduced the letter as evidence. <br /> Whit-tea asked Fred Hazzard if he wished to present evidence.Hazzard <br /> responded no, but he had been sworn irase he was asked to respond to <br /> questions. <br /> Crawford asked Hazzard if he knew details about his operations ie. <br /> employees, managers etc. Hazzard responded negatively adding the developers <br /> were looking at models and similar local operations including Burlington <br /> Municipal:). He indicated he would not discuss these details. He respon- <br /> to Gustaveson's question regarding like examples stating airports <br /> differ fran locale to locale. He noted he was concerned about, climatic <br /> ,!ei . aspects of keeping a runway operational. sh <br /> o-v t/310 <br /> Crawford inquired about construction materials. Hazard responeta0 that <br /> if there were not air evacuation operations at Midway it would be un- <br /> likely that they would remove the snow and would probably close the <br /> r"•- <br /> u facility. He added they were considering perpetual care operations for <br /> maintenance purposes. <br /> Crawford asked if fuel would be sold. Hazzard answered yes. <br /> Crawford inquired about hours of operation. Hazard responded that a <br /> package of data would be provided following these procedures that would govern <br /> traffic patterns, noise control measures and hours of operation. Crawford <br /> asked when this Would be provided citing the difficulty of selling a project <br /> nobody knows about. Hazzard responded that these its were hard to specify <br /> given uncertanity about runway length that would be approved. <br /> Gustaveson asked the cost for Phase 1. Hazzard respondedile.did not know <br /> it as the cost of labor, stone, and mgaey are never the same fran day <br /> to day and that they were not sure ofqmount needed and cannot negotiate <br /> for costs until project is approved. Gustaveson asked for a range of <br /> costs. Hazzard responded well under a million in construction costs <br /> noting counties could not keep costs so low. <br /> Whitted inquirel_about instruments at the airport. Hazzard indicated there <br /> 1 A IL n <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.