Browse
Search
Agenda - 07-08-1982
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1982
>
Agenda - 07-08-1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2017 3:30:02 PM
Creation date
4/3/2017 3:17:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
7/8/1982
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
170
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
'159 <br /> the Gotulty's adoption of a Zoning Ordinance last fall. The developer was <br /> asking that the project continue as originally planned. Mr. McAdams said <br /> there were 48 existing units and 32 more were planned. He said the site is <br /> served by water and sower lines and is well suited for high density develop- <br /> ment. With regard to concern # 2 expressed by the Planning Staff, Mr. McAdams <br /> said the "developer does propose to provide recreation facilities; this is a <br /> rezoning request and it is his intent to provide recreational facilities and <br /> to all the renters who have moved into the first 48 units,, he has told them <br /> that recreational facilities will be there. He does intend to provide them." <br /> Mr. McAdams continued that for the remainder of the concerns, fire protection, <br /> trash removal, paving, parking, landscaping, etc., "these things will be pro- <br /> vided in the manner that has been established by the development of the first <br /> 60%." Mr. McAdams Said the erasting development provides "the knowledge of the <br /> standard that would be used in the continuation of the development." Mr. <br /> McAdams continued by stressing "that it is the 80 units which renders feasible <br /> the provision of recreation facilities, the amenities, the maintenance of the <br /> development in the manner which the developer has proposed." Mr. McAdams said <br /> that 48 units had not proved large enough for the developer to provide a "swiming <br /> pool" but it was in his original plan to provide a pool for the development. <br /> Ms. Crawford thanked Mr. McAdams for his presentation and comments and <br /> asked members of the Boards if they had questions of Mr. McAdams. <br /> Mr. Kizer: Asked if the roads were intended-10 be paved. <br /> Mr. McAdams: Replied the roads would be paved with a tar and gravel <br /> surface treatment known as "macadam." <br /> Commissioner Willhoit: Oted that the developer's statement said water <br /> and sewer services were available, he asked if "there was a commitment on the <br /> part of the Town to provide that." <br /> Mr. McAdams: Said the 48 existing units had water and sewer lines and <br /> the Town was "willing to allow" those lines to be extended to the proposed 38 <br /> units. <br /> Commissioner Willhoit: Pursued the matter by asking the Planning Staff <br /> if such a commitment had been "secured from the Tom of Hillsborough Board." <br /> Mr; Cannity: Responded that "I don't have anything in writing from the <br /> Tom Board." <br /> Commissioner Willhoit: Said he felt a written commitment from the Tom <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.