Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
0?,I,-,r.E Ccu"ay <br /> BakqU 0-7 CWUSSIO'�!� Action ,-a <br /> AjG-"%MN ITZ—L°l Pas!Mt = Item. Yo�,Z--Lzi-A� <br /> NIE6T? :C D-yTr-: July 6, 1992 <br /> Subject: Proposed Text changes to the Zoning Ordinance <br /> Planning joli <br /> -t� c Hearing: X nc <br /> a Contact- , Ri,&, Canrdty <br /> Attadmwent(s)*- Taxt Ammdnients = <br /> Phone Nj=bar: 32-8181 Ext 347 <br /> PUP,POSE To receive Planning Board rec=nandations on proposed changes to the <br /> Zoning Ordinance Text. <br /> NEM.- The proposed changes in the Zoning Ordmance '.tact are intended to <br /> make the application of certain districts more specific, a-Ucw the <br /> County Manager to oartify that ocaditions for Planned Mvelag,=ts <br /> and Special Use Peintits have been rmt, and to implement some of <br /> the xeccxw. endations of the Water Rasourcems Tall: Form Report on <br /> watershed protection. <br /> nTACr.- The changes to Article 4.2.19, Economic Ve-velopt=t District are <br /> more specific about the application criteria of the district than <br /> the existIng wording. The proposed addition of Article 4.2.27 <br /> Protected Watershed 11 (P4�U) District would implement some <br /> recommendations on watershed protection. it will be applied to <br /> all watersheds except the urban portia-i of JJQCiowans Creek as <br /> designated by the Imd Use Plan. Me proposed change in 6.3.1 <br /> would be more specific than the existing wording about where and <br /> how duplex units would be allowed. Another change in 6.3.1 would <br /> require all new lots, have frontage on state maintained road or a <br /> private road built to Orange County private road standards. She <br /> changes to Article 3.5 would allow the County tSanaqer to certify <br /> that the conditions of a Planned Develop.-ent or Special ioL <br /> Permit have been mt. <br /> Planning Board recomiends approval of the promised changes as they <br /> are written, with the exception of the following item: The last <br /> paragraph of 6.3.1 should be held for further work by the Planning <br /> Staffj She changes in Section 7.6 and 8.5 should be rewritten so <br /> that they read the soma (Attachr.mt shows changes) Section 4.2. <br /> 19b.) Item 2 and 3 shbuld be =,tined as shown on the attached <br /> sheets i The deletion of Section 6.23,2.0 having to do with lot <br /> sizes for minor subdivisions in the PW-11 District. <br />