Agenda - 07-06-1982 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

PlAtVING BOARD MNUMS URAFT June 21, 1.982 MMEPS PMSENT. Pat CraiBord, (chair), John Wilson, David Shanklin, Steve Kizer, Sally Boericke, Logan Irvin, Tan Bacot, Hazel Lunsford, Nancy Lamlo S=: - Jim Polatty, Pick Cannity, F!red IA , Eddie Kirk, Keith Fosemoad AGWM 17EM 10: Paul Kempa - Ettzoning at the intersection of US 70 and Palmers Grove Church Road. Cannity described the Mirosal explaining that there was a possibility of two separate lots being created from the property. Mike Parker, Keirpa's representative, passed cut maps 6ianng nearby camnarcial uses. He told the Board that op- position to the rezoning voiced at the hearing was based an the belief that the intersection has a high rate of traffic accidents. Parker presented a =qnter printout from MT that listed me major accident at the intersection in the last 3 years. He added that other intersections almg U.S. 70 Fast have higher accident rates. Parker told the Board that the developers has no burediate plans for the property until an alternate waste system is approved. Boericke asked if 5 acres was the maximn total for comiercial development with- in the node. Cann ty told the Board that zcning lots had been created around the other uses, but that the Kempa retuning wruld take up most of the remaining acres allotted for the nods. A man from the audience told the Board that some erosion damage had been caused by trees being cut down on the property. QUuAty stated that until the stmps were removed or the lot cleared the County could not enforce the erosion control ordinance. Shanklin remarked that if the property was rezoned cone erosion stabilization would be done by the required. Polatty told the Board that the neighbors had not opposed the land use plan designation of a comtercial node at the intersection during the land use plan hearings. Barbour spoke fxom the audience that the neighbors might not have kna.4n that the intersection had been proposed as a conmercial area. Parker told the Board that the only "Logical." use of property would be coavercial. YMON: Kizer roved that the Board rec=mnd approval of the Paul Kempa remning request. Be= seconded. Irvin said that he was concerned that if the property were removed without se-wage disposal that other comerciaL proposals might be encouraged. Polatty stated that the applicants had acted according to the adopted land use plan. If the land use plan were to be amended, then so be it but the applicants should not be penalized for having acted in good faith an an adopted plan. VOM. is favor of =tion. Bacon, Shanklin, Kizer, Lunsford Opposed: Wilson, Boericke, Laszlo, Irvin cx-.wf=d bnalm tie by voting favor of the notion.