Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
Ml✓i.w-rur.i.F.l:�,�r+e r:r:ww.r+.+rrrr+r.rwnri4.`M "+.r.,.r.......w"' - <br /> ,V�,yy�C,N.....+. <br /> 0 kNCE CO;.o`N-MC <br /> i <br /> BO-Z,n 0: C0}Fr3IS5IGYE S A--tion Ranch <br /> I=:ENG D-ATF June 15 1922 <br /> Sc�jM Participatory Paving PrograMR <br /> Planning Public Hearing: _des X n <br /> Attacra�,_°_*t(s): Orange County irifc� ti n Contacts Susan Smith <br /> 1981 Point System <br /> }?hcsnn Iv'h.ry.be�= 732-3181 EXT. 359 <br /> PURPOSE: leprioritization of PPP projects nS Libsccarb Grove Church Road, N <br /> willet Road and n7 Mace Road. <br /> TAD: Project 47 Mace T3cad is a subdivision mad serving 53 residences. <br /> 'The local share of the construction costs for Trace ibad is $18,184. <br /> Local funds are available an the Cc)mty proposed 1982-83 budget <br /> allocation for the Participatory Paving Program to pave this road. <br /> However, projects 413 and 116, which are rural roads subject to the <br /> new DDT policy on the local share of construction costs for rural <br /> roads precede project ';r7 on the priority list. At a minimum these <br /> two projects will require the major part of a given annual allo- <br /> cation for the P,rogran. the result would be a disproportionate <br /> amount of funds being used to pave rural roads at the expense of a <br /> i ud5di v3sicn road which the program was designed to address. <br /> Neither of the rural roads have been officially approved by DDT <br /> for the Participatory Paving Program, but were Listed on the DOT <br /> 1981 point system. Both Libscorrb Grove Church Road and willet Thad <br /> are in the top 10% of the unpaved secondary roads on the 1981 <br /> point system. Lisccrrb Grove Church Road is the top paving project <br /> following completion of the 1982-83 Secondary Ihad ImproverTent <br /> Program. willet Road is project 118. Both are tentatively sched- <br /> uled by DOT to be paved as part of the unpaved secondary roads <br /> program, but not as PPP projects. <br /> DIPACT: Repriori.tization of the projects would remedy -the incaisistency <br /> between the Program's objectives and the prioritization of current <br /> County projects and would allow Mace Toad to be paved at a date <br /> eaxlier than presently anticipated. <br /> �EOD2+ ENDATIM: re-prioritize approved projects so that Mace Poad n7 is prioritized <br /> before projects RS and ;1'6. <br /> Request that DOT add Mace !bad to the 1932--83 Secondary Dads <br /> Improvement Program. <br />