Agenda - 07-06-1982 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

r C?k -E COir�"x"a' EoAro o- Ca•2•1ISSIOM� Ac ioa Aganda AG.£IrJ3 F:"z l IT1w1 riFs'r:nCf t.''E`.��.T.PN MTE June 15 1 n,2 Subjec�-,: Participatory Paving Program DepM.t,r.zut: Planning Public ltaar=g: yes V Attar.h.-,,e"lt(s): a) Approved Projects; lr�foixatioa Cantac:: Susan Smith~ b} LOT Policy for Paving Rural Roads; c) Yrao d 3 -83 Secondary Road pkon° k�"'u,^�- 732-3161 Ext. 359 � PURPOSE: To review the DW policy for paving rural roads by Property Owners Partici- pation (P.O.P.; P.P.P.) and existing orange County policy on prioritizing Participatory Paving Program projects. t1EED: DOT has recently formally established a policy fcn•different iati.ng between rural and suzbdivisioru esidential roads eligible for paving under the Participatory paving program. Subdivision and residential roads are roads specifically constructed to serve the residences along the road. Rural roads are roads which servee primarily as traffic corridors and secondarily provide access to residences:Aue policy requires that rural roads be subject to all cost for paving above ."x8.00 percenterline foot as opposed to a maximum $14.00 per centerline foot for subdivision and re- sidential roads. under this policy two Orange County P.P.P. projects are new classified by DOT as' rural roads: Libscorrb Grove Church Road (SR 1574) and Wi.l.let Road (SR 15G8). These roads are priorities =5 and A6 in the Orange County Program. Paving of these roads under the County priority system will require t-,te enmrioerance of a large proportion of the total avail- able P.P.P. funds in given year. It has not yet been determined whether affected residents will be willing to pay the larger cots for paving the roads. The remaining projects are eligible for funding on the regular basis of $4.00 per linear foot, and will be paved according to priority. Range- wood subdivision ((rl) cannot be paved, hazever, until construction of water and sewer Lines is ompleted in July 1983. Mace Road (V) , under current County policy, cannot be paved until 15 and rG (rural roads) are either paved, becone ineligible or withdrat-r from the Program. The County may wish to either reaffirm or revise the policy for prior- itizing P.P.P. projects. The fbIlcwi.ng policy options are available for the Board's consideration: 1. Feaffirn current policy which prioritizes projects on a "first come,e, first serve"^basis regardless of type of road. 2. Revise the prioritization policy for all new requests to distinguish between subdivision/residential and rural roads and prioritize subdivision/residential roads above rural. roads. Rural roads would be paved either as funds permit or cn the basis of a conbined funding and waiting period formula i.e as finds permit and within five years of the data of request. 3. Same as 142 except the revised policy would be immediately applicable to projects 05 and T6. Project ;r7 would then be prioritized before projects 1#5 and OG. d. Fevise the policy so that for new requests all rural roads would 3e. ineligible for the County paving progran. 5. Samoa as #rd except the revised policy would be iv ediately applicable to projects 1,15 and 11,16.