Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
p, %R 0: CCx?1TSSIGNERS Action _ ri <br /> " <br /> AC'. ON <br /> ?• L. CG D.:,Tz July 6, 1932 <br /> 5uo7e Proposed Tent changes to the :.,cuing ordinance <br /> moo= Wit: P1 xg PubLc Hearing. Yes no <br /> ,«t ion Canted: Rick, <br /> AttaclMezt(s): Text Amzndi ts Ca��nitzy <br /> Phon° N x,,b.,er: 32--8181 Ext 347 <br /> vURPCSE: rro receive Planning Board reca7rendaticns on proposed changes to the <br /> Zaling ordinances Text. <br /> �w axe proposed changes in the Zoning ordinance 111ext are intended to <br /> make the application of certain districts mare sp ci fic,r allow.the _.. <br /> County manager to certify that canditicns for Planned Daveloazents <br /> and Special. Use Pendts have been rat, and to implerent some of <br /> the xeca=end'aticns of the Slater Jzesources Task Ibrc e Report ca <br /> Watershed protection. <br /> IMACC: the changes to Article 4.2.19, Eooaa-.t-i c revelopaient District are <br /> more spacific about the applicati_cnx criteria of the district than <br /> the existing wording. the proposed addition of Article 4.2.27 <br /> Protected watershed II (ni-II) District would i.Talerent scfne- <br /> recounendaticns cn watershed protection. It wi- 1. be applied to <br /> all watersheds except the urban por-tiax of McGcwans Creek as <br /> designated by the I,an.d Use Plan. Sze proposed change in 6.3.1 <br /> would be mre sprecifi.c than the existing wording about where and <br /> heir duplex units would be allowed. Another change in G.3.1 would <br /> re Dare all new lots, have frontage on state maintained road or a <br /> private road built to orange County private road standards. %e. <br /> chances to Article 3.5 would allow the County Manager to certify <br /> that the ccnditicxns of a Planned Develog-,ent or, Special. Lot <br /> Permit have been mi t. <br /> 10-TD Wit: Planning Board reoorzrends approval of the p+rpposed chances as they <br /> are written, with the exception of the following item: ' r1 he last <br /> paragraph of 6.3.1. should be held for further work by the Planning <br /> Staffs She changes in Secticn 7.6 and 8.5 should be rewritten so <br /> that they read the sa�ej (Attachx*ent shcxws changes) Section 4.2. <br /> 19b.) item 2 and 3 should be oar,•bi.ned as shown on tin attached <br /> sheets] The deletion of Section 6.23.2.0 having to do with lot <br /> sizes for minor subdivisions in the PW-II District. <br />