Agenda - 06-22-1982 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

�� 0 r'� �`- ~~=`~ . ' 4.9 that before the person could be hired, the Federal cuts took effect and the Social Services Board had implemented a reduction in Staff and Service; if the Commissioners had not set aside the $16,000 two positions would have been lost, rather than the anticipated one position. Social Services Director Tom Ward said that his department did anticipate an additional $39,856 due to a change in the formula for Medicaid reimbursement; that leaves about $10,000 needed for Social Services, County Manager told the Board that the County had had the roofs at Stanford School inspected tndmy. The inspection was done by Board of Education Staff, County Staff and Mr. Pickard of Pickard Roofing in Durham, The Manager said Mr. Pickard's estimate of %38,000 considered the damage, corrective action for the damage (re- roofing both sides of the gym and the connecting areas) and added insulation; he added that this 'roof would be guaranteed for 20 years. Dr. Lunsford, Board of Education Staff, told the Board that: 1) there were a number of areas regarding the Stanford roof wherein both the Board of Education consultant and County consultant agreed; 2) areas of dis- agreement are based on two points. He continued that it was pouring rain when the roof was inspected and that the Board of Education consultant had gone over all threestructures, not just one and parts of the others, and had taken up portions of the roof and "gone down to the decking." Dr. Lunsford said that Mr. Pickard himself had today agreed that he had had to replace the same type of shingles, as currently are on the Stanford roofs. Dr. Lunsford read from the consultant's letter which said that they had cut down to the jepdeck and it was split; Dr. Lunsford said this had not been done by the County consultant. Dr. Lunsford said that based on his consultant's work, which he feels was more thorough than that conducted on this date, he feels there are more extensive problems which the $38,000 spent on one part of the roof will not correct. He said there was a "difference of opinion" here and there was no problem with such a difference, however, on behalf of the Board of Education he had to "continue to advocate" for the entire $300,000 for the Stanford roof and the additional moneys for capital as requested by his Board. The Manager told the Board the problem was "not so much the pitch of the roof but rather the type of material used in the shingle" according to Mr. Pickard. The Manager said Mr. Pickard had said such a shingle would split and this was what had occured in the gym on one side and may well occur in other areas later.