Agenda - 02-16-2006-2 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

PREAMBLE Three different variations of potential district elections maps/plans (of the original initial 5 draft maps/plans) are provided. The maps/plans are as follows: PROPOSAL 2 FIVE COMMISSIONERS WITH TWO MULTIMEMBER DISTRICTS ONE THREE-MEMBER DISTRICT & ONE TWO-MEMBER DISTRICT All five members could be nominated in the Primaries either by their respective District Voters OR by all County Voters, and all five members would be elected in General Election by all County Voters, PROPOSAL3 SEVEN COMMISSIONERS -ONE TWO-MEMBER DISTRICT/TWO SINGLE MEMBER DISTRICTS/THREE AT LARGE The four members from the three districts must reside in those respective districts and could be nominated in the Primaries either by their respective District Voters OR by all County Voters, Three at-large members would be nominated in the Primaries by all County Voters. All seven members would be elected in the General Election by all County Voters. PROPOSAL 5 FIVE COMMISSIONERS -ONE TWO-MEMBER DISTRICT/ONE SINGLE MEMBER DISTRICT/TWO AT LARGE The three members from the two districts must reside in those respective districts and could be nominated in the Primazies either by their respective District Voters OR by all County Voters. Two at-large members would be nominated in the Primaries by all County Voters.. All five members would be elected in the General Election by all County Voters. A set of DRAFT Principles and a DRAFT Process/Timetable is also provided for review. Other documents detailing the base census data upon which these initial maps were developed are also provided. The information detailed includes the 2000 Census total population, the "ideal population" for district delineation, the population ranges permissiblern districts based on legal provisions, and the actual population numbers of the delineated districts for each plan.