Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-21-1982
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1982
>
Agenda - 06-21-1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/31/2017 11:08:29 AM
Creation date
3/31/2017 11:06:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/21/1982
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
, ....... ..• <br /> 9,0 OF fo <br /> timing County *hoofs <br /> ov.ifve4, 7; <br /> 0 <br /> ,170,000'' <br /> . . <br /> • co.N.ry . <br /> s• .b.g r <br /> e, <br /> 200 EAST KING STREET <br /> HILLSBOROUGH,NORTH CAROLINA 27278 <br /> OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT (910 732.8126 <br /> June 21, 1982 <br /> 1 <br /> MEMORANDUM <br /> TO: Orange County Commissioners <br /> FROM: Dan G. Lunsford 024------- <br /> Assistant Superintendent for Instruction <br /> REFERENCE: Roofing Needs - Charles W. Stanford Junior High School <br /> On last Thursday, you asked that we provide to the Commissioners <br /> more specific information on the roofing needs at Charles W. Stanford <br /> Junior High School. I have discussed in great detail this matter <br /> with our roof consultants of Robert M. Stafford Inc. from Charlotte. <br /> As I stated, the source of the problem is the "pitch" of the roof <br /> (current elevation) is two and one-half inches per foot , when the mini- <br /> mum should be four inches per foot . <br /> One way to deal with the problem is to increase the roof elevation, <br /> and then reinstall shingles; however, the consultants have chosen to <br /> not recommend this procedure since it would be cost prohibitive. I <br /> regret that I gave you some incorrect information; however, you will <br /> recall our "handicap" during the meeting. <br /> According to our consultants, the best way to proceed is to have <br /> "the complete removal of all existing roofing, expansion joint covers, <br /> flashings and metal flashings; repair of any existing wet , damaged, or <br /> deteriorating poured gypsum decking and/or fiber glass form board; and <br /> the installation of a new asphalt built-up roof membrane, We further <br /> recommend that consideration be given to the installation of additional <br /> roof insulation in conjunction with proposed reroofing. <br /> The cost breakdown is as follows : <br /> APPROX. ROOF COST INSULATION <br /> Bldg. #100 - $ 96,000 $15,750 <br /> Bldg. #200 165,000 26,775 <br /> Bldg. #300 39,000 6,300 <br /> TOTAL $300,000 $48,825 <br /> i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.