Agenda - 02-01-1982 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

�� uv`m," ^ ^di�� .. ' /. Sr ' � L.-, MEMORANDUM TO: County Attorney FROM: County Manager DATE: January 8, 1982 RE: Contract Application of Kit Smith Home Improvement Company Dated January 6, 1982 On December 31 1981 Mr. Kit Smith and a Mr. Mort Levy came to see me regardipg the � "to file this application. Mr' Smith is the intent th ti r hand, did most of the talking. He c»ncontractor; Mr. Levy, on the o np ` ' ` ~' - � � said he was a part owner of the company that t had previously (on the same day) been to see Albert been t Kittrell and complained that they had ee n denied further participation in the CD program. One job had been done formerly. As I gather, unsatisfactory perfor- mance of that job together with knowledge that the company had been denied nership in the Durham CD program caused our CD Director to ban them from participation h _ /- ��l � -The points-they � ncloded t�e� ow ng� 1. The work should not have been judged unsatisfactory had received favorable comment from the property nxu (Miss Katie McNeil who has since died) and a signed owner f!cate of satisfactiun. They acknowledge that a CD certificate developed a letter outlining certain deficien- cies . ' staff member 1981 letter of Robert D Wilson, Rahab Spe- cialist).( 22, e ar o D. of the letter cialis' )` They said they were not aware o ne until their meeting with Mr. Kittrell, however. 2. The fact that the job was late by five days should not be ^ deposit for 60 days - The An amount of �l l90 was on epo a fuctnr n umo , . -�- _ factor. ° ^^~ of -� - for anything not completed. Horeuve{` pay ment of $10 per day was paid as penalty for lateness. 3. Being banned from the Durham program should not be a criterion for eligibility. Mr. Levy pointed out that the Durham letter was dated April 15, 1981, the Smith . Company was awarded work in June or early July, Mr. Kittrell's letter to Mr. Smith--denying further. participotiu,--,"` dated July 16, 1981. ' '