Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-01-1982
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1982
>
Agenda - 02-01-1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2017 10:14:09 AM
Creation date
3/30/2017 10:04:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/1/1982
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19820201
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1980's\1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
00470- <br /> OCOUNTY o COUNTY <br /> - <br /> BOARD OF CaLMISSIONEDS Action Agenda <br /> Item /~) �/ <br /> /�' �� 7 <br /> ACTION AGENDA rrai yosurACr <br /> DATE 1/29/82 <br /> Drbjzct: Housing Rehabilitation Application of Mr. Kid Smith <br /> public W=°riog: yes X. r | <br /> , " - "."' <br /> . . <br /> -�_- <br /> • Contact: Ken Thompson <br /> Attachment(s): Yes Information <br /> - - m,sTtbe±.7 Exf 501 — . - <br /> PURPOSE: To consider application to further participate in construction awards. <br /> NEED: The Charles Smith Home Improvement Company remodeled the Katy McNeil <br /> home in Northern Fairview under HUD contract. The oUntr t <br /> MalEhil.,12E1_,.. authorized to proceed March 24, 1981, and completed <br /> to the fact that the job was late in completion-- <br /> � �' 1981. � <br /> thereby causing inconvenience to the owner--a fine of $10 a day for <br /> 5 days was withheld h e contractor' final payment, Moreover, <br /> due to the work having been performed inefficiently (as documented <br /> by Robert D. Wilson, Rehab Specialist, memo dated May 22, 1981) and <br /> a negative reference was received from DurhaMCnunty (dated April 10, <br /> '' 1981) the company was banned from receiving further work. <br /> On January 6, 1982, the company reapplied for participation. The CD <br /> Director's determination was to continue the ban, He had the concurrence <br /> of the HUD Regional Office and CD Task Force and the County Manager on <br /> the decision. <br /> IMPACT: Insure the proper expenditure of public funds through monitoring of work <br /> performance. <br /> RECOMMENDATION(S) : Continue to ban the Company from participation, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.