Agenda - 02-01-1982 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

00467 desired. Ccmnissioner Gustaveson moved, seconded by Commissioner Willhoit, to approve the Manager's recommendation of purchase of two mid-size patrol vehicles for the Sheriff's department and according to the specifications submitted by the Purchasing Officer (See page of this book for those specifications). Cormissioner Willhoit noted that the County Sheriff's department was not involved in "pursuit" and suggested the "certified for pursuit" specification be stricken; the consensus was to do so. Vote: Ayes, 5; noes, 0. Dr. Pamela Mayer: Dr. Mayer presented a brief report to the Board on the budget calendar of the Chapel Hill-Carrboro Schools. She said they were in the process of examining discretionary programs by sham's for effectiveness, with improvements assigned a priority. Cormissioner. Willhoit said it would be most helpful if the Board could see the costs for 1)required programs; and, 2) source of funding; and,3) if there is a required match. 1. The Timbers: This was returned from the agenda of January 19, 1982. Chairman Whitted asked Mr. Cannity to surmarize first the Planning Board's recom- mendations; Mr. Cannity did so, those recommendations are on pages of this book. Chairman Whitted aaked if all the Planning Board recommendations had been net by the developer and Mr. Cannity replied in the affirmative. Chairman Whitted then asked Mr. Cannity to summarize the Planning recormendations; Mr. Cannity did so saying the main concern of the Department was for the privacy of the individuals. He said they preferred a design more "sympathetic" to the site which slopes gently; he added there was no screening between the units which ware too close together. The Planning Department's reconuendaticri is on page of this book. Chairman Whitted noted that some structures were already in place, i.e. sewer and water lines, which dictated to some extent the layout of the development. The County Attorney said the Board should address the timing of the develop- ment with regard to the deed restrictions and the phasing in and maintenance of the public improvements. Mr. Cannity said the Planning Staff and developer had discussed that and agreed to phase in the project in four phases of approximately eighteen units each time with the improvements to be completed prior to the issuing of the building permits for the subsequent phase. Mr. enmity said the developer had some problems at the,moment with the paving of the access road but that the Board could address that and any of the other improvements would have to be complete before each subsequent phase was begun. The pool was planned for the fourth and final phase.