Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
O459 <br /> inquiry fran this letter never came. It never came. <br /> Commissioner Willhoit: So then it did not affect negatively the decision to <br /> allow participation? <br /> Mx. Levi: That's a value judgment. <br /> Commissioner Willhoit: Well, it's a fact. <br /> Mr. Levi (interrupting): It's obvious that you haven't read the letter that <br /> he wrote, because the letter that he wrote contradicts what You are saying. <br /> He said that the basis of denial is the information that we received from" <br /> Durham. And you're saying that it didn't have a negative impact. And I'm <br /> confused in terms of plus and minuses. What's plus and what's minus? <br /> Commissioner Willhoit: I'm saying that the contract was signed. <br /> Mr. Levi: That's the only way he could participate. <br /> Chairman. Whitted: Yes, Ms. Marshall. <br /> Commissioner Marshall: Mr. Levi, this is not the priority but what the iettpr <br /> says. The letter that I have a copy of shows that careful review that <br /> the company completed construction five days over your scheduled time limit <br /> and your company's work performance was inefficient. And it just says <br /> additionally we are concerned about the negative reference from the City <br /> of Durham's Community Development Department. <br /> Mr, Levi: Yes <br /> Commissioner Marshall: It does not deny the application specifically and soley <br /> or even as a criteria, it quite clearly says it is not the criterion, it <br /> just mentions concern. <br /> Mr. Levi: Ah is that your, the letter you received fram him. <br /> Chairman Whitted: That's the letter that went to Mr. Smith on July 16th, 1981. <br /> 1 Mr. Levi: Yes, you're saying it does not deny participation? <br /> Commissioner Marshall: No, I'm saying it does not deny participation as using <br /> the negative reference from the City of Durham as a criterion, it just <br /> mentions concern about that in addition to the two criteria that were given. <br /> Mr. Levi: Sure, Ah. Thank you and I'd appreciate that. I would like to know at <br /> this point since it was mentioned, ah there was some basis for so considering <br /> it. Now, if it were not used for denial what was? And if what was used for <br /> denial was used, ,then how did that impact on the completed product? You see, <br /> in the final analysis you have a completed product. And that completed <br /> product represents a person's satisfaction emanating fium the property owner <br />