Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
it G3 rn\ Tr <br /> 21 <br /> --- <br /> Lane extending south along the swale to the <br /> southern boundary line. <br /> 3. Revise the 20' drainage easement shown between <br /> • Lots 4 and 5 to be 30' in width and to follow <br /> the existing drainage channel. <br /> 4. Submit an erosion control plan for approval <br /> • prior to any disturbance of the site. <br /> 5. On the final plat, indicated the acreage of <br /> • each lot, including and excluding the road <br /> right-of-way. • <br /> 6. Submit Restrictive Covenants and a Private <br /> • Road maintenanbe Agreement for review and <br /> approval by the County Attorney. <br /> 7 . Submit a revised landscape plan for approval <br /> prior to installation of required landscaping. <br /> 8. Submit payment-in-lieu of dedication of <br /> recreation/open space in the amount of <br /> $416.00. <br /> Eddleman asked that a condition be added for no <br /> further Subdivision of the five lots. Yuhasz <br /> noted that it could be a part of condition #6. <br /> Ms. Belinda Wells, Ballentine Associates, <br /> representing the applicant, stated that the <br /> applicant would like the flexibility to make <br /> passive agricultural use of portions of the <br /> remainder of the property, with the ability to <br /> subdivide for that purpose. <br /> Yuhasz indicated those uses could be handled <br /> without further subdivision. <br /> Jacobs noted that rental or lease agreements for <br /> agricultural uses do not require further <br /> subdivision. <br /> After further discussion, it was decided to add a <br /> condition #9 for no further subdivision of the <br /> five lots. <br /> MOTION: Yuhasz moved approval with the Staff conditions <br /> and adding condition #9 that the restrictive <br /> covenants prohibit further subdivision of the five <br /> lots. Seconded by Best. <br /> VOTE: Unanimous. <br /> imommitammammeaw <br />