Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-01-1989
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1989
>
Agenda - 08-01-1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2017 5:05:14 PM
Creation date
3/10/2017 4:35:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/1/1989
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
495
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> NLTNHQ 17 APRIL 1989 PAGE 2 <br /> 21 <br /> 3. This proposed zoning change would carry out the intent <br /> and purpose of the adopted land use in that it would <br /> enhance the adopted plan. This change would address the <br /> need for different activities other than residential <br /> bordering 1-40 which could not only act as additional <br /> buffer between 1-40 and the surrounding community but <br /> also address the lack of consideration given to the <br /> property impacted directly by 1-40. <br /> 4. We offer the following in support of this rezoning : <br /> a. This site is located in an area which is not to be <br /> served with public utilities (sewer and water) for <br /> at least 20 years. Restrictions, therefore, would <br /> be self imposing upon any development. Density and <br /> intensity of development would be limited as a <br /> result. <br /> b. The proposed zoning change would correct the fact <br /> that the existing zoning ordinance fails to <br /> recognize negative impacts of an interstate highway <br /> on adjacent properties. This- would be done by <br /> giving the opportunity to allow for a reasonable, <br /> acceptable usage of these negatively impacted <br /> 1 properties. <br /> c. The proposed zoning parallels the existing zoning in <br /> terms of uses. The only differences being that those <br /> uses permitted in 'AR' district which are not <br /> permitted in 'RBI district are further regulated by <br /> requiring a special use permit. <br /> • • <br /> d. The initial impacts of noise that, the county <br /> considered prior to the completion of 1-40 were in <br /> error.. The actual size of the impacted area, and db <br /> level, is greater than was anticipated. <br /> • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.