Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
9 <br /> subdivision process, with the fourth lot being the <br /> remainder. ) <br /> There is also a proposed revision in Section IV-B- <br /> 10 Cluster Subdivision. This is a minor change to <br /> application requirements for Cluster Subdivision <br /> to provide consistency in requirements between <br /> major and minor subdivisions. <br /> The proposed amendment was presented for public <br /> hearing on May 22, 1989 . There were no comments <br /> from the public or from the Board of County <br /> Commissioners . <br /> The Planning Staff recommends approval of the <br /> proposed amendments. <br /> Jacobs asked why the Planning Staff recommendation <br /> is for 4 lots + remainder rather than 3 lots + <br /> remainder as recommended by the Planning Board. <br /> Crudup responded that this would be consistent <br /> with Chapel Hill and Carrboro regulations. <br /> MOTION: Lewis moved approval. Seconded by Hamilton. <br /> VOTE: Unanimous (Best out of the room during this vote) . <br /> AGENDA ITEM #10: PLANNING BOARD ITEMS <br /> a. Bingham TAC Appointments <br /> Presentation by David Stancil. <br /> Stancil, on behalf of the Bingham TAC, asked that <br /> the current six active members be reappointed and <br /> that two new members be appointed. <br /> Jacobs noted that all TAC's should be reviewed and <br /> brought up-to-date and the matter was referred to <br /> the Long Range Planning Board meeting to be held <br /> July 11, 1989 . <br /> b. New Hope Creek Corridor Study <br /> Crudup indicated this item was informational only. <br /> (A copy of the abstract information is an <br /> attachment to these minutes on pages ) . <br /> Jacobs asked if there is to be a Planning Board <br /> representative on Steering Committee for this <br /> study. Crudup responded that the information she <br /> had indicated that a Staff and/or Planning Board <br /> member could be appointed to serve on the Steering 1 <br />