Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-28-1989
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1989
>
Agenda - 06-28-1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2017 4:29:57 PM
Creation date
3/10/2017 4:03:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/28/1989
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
296
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
20 <br /> INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM <br /> TO: Emily Crudup, ASLA Planner II <br /> FROM Paul Thames, County Engine DATE: McLennan's Farms <br /> SUBJECT: June 15, 1989 <br /> I have visited the site for the above project with the <br /> owner-Leon Todd, the engineer-Craig Morgan and the planner- <br /> Dan Jewel, and I have the following comments: <br /> a) The site proposed for the low pressure distribution field <br /> appears to be ideal , from a topographic standpoint, for <br /> the low pressure distribution lateral system. <br /> b) I am not qualified to determine if the field's soils are <br /> suitable for the proposed system or for the proposed <br /> application. I was told that the entire field, a small <br /> percentage of which was tree covered, has been judged <br /> suitable. <br /> c) My chief concern, expressed in my original review, <br /> dealing with the limited differential between the <br /> required field area and the available field areit, has been <br /> satisfactorily addressed, with the assumption that the <br /> soils for the entire site shown me are suitable. <br /> d) The other concerns, expressed in the original memo, <br /> regarding elements of the system design are as yet <br /> unaddressed. However, those concerns can be addressed in <br /> the design process, assuming that we will have design <br /> review authority. The design review authority for the <br /> County should be a condition of approval . <br /> e) I was verbally assured that the septic system would be <br /> designed for loading from 14 - 3 bedroom houses instead <br /> of 14 -3 1/2 bedroom houses as origionally proposed. <br /> This change would give some additional margin for <br /> adjustment in the field sizing design. This change <br /> should be addressed in the approval process. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.