Orange County NC Website
' - - <br /> --Orange county adopted the "rural buffer (RB) designation <br /> with 1 unit per 2 acre minimum lot size . <br /> 12 <br /> --The NC Division of Environmental Management (DEM) classified <br /> University Lake as a "WS—I " watershed--its highest <br /> rating, after extensive study and public hearings. <br /> --The OWASA study by Camp , Dresser , and McKee concluded that . <br /> protection of already threatened University Lake required <br /> at least the following: <br /> --development at no oreater. than 1 unit per 5 acres; or, <br /> --density of 1 unit per 2 acres only with structural <br /> "BMP's" ; that is, wet detention ponds which are <br /> publicly owned and maintained; or , <br /> --Clustering in which approximately 85 percent of the land <br /> remained permanently undisturbed; and, <br /> --use of individual septic systems as the prefered means of <br /> waste disposal ; and, <br /> --no extension of water and sewer service into the <br /> watersehd except , perhaps, to serve cluster <br /> developments near existing service ; and, <br /> --no use of alternative waste s stems because of their <br /> greater unreliability. <br /> --The DEM,' permitting agency for Amberly's waste treatment <br /> system, held in Carrboro its first ever public meeting on <br /> a non—discharge system because . Citizens and public <br /> officials, including Orange County Commission Chair Moses <br /> Carey, urged extreme caution in protecting the watershed. <br /> --DEM Director Paul Wilms turned down Amberly's permit stating <br /> the development "will allow urbanization of the <br /> watershed, and, therefore , will not be compatable with <br /> the requirements" for WS—I watersheds. Specifically, Mr . <br /> Wilms found that : <br /> 1 ) The development and its waste waster treatment facility <br /> "are not in accordance with the requirement that the <br /> watershed remain, in a natural and predominately <br /> unihabited state" ; <br /> 2) "The development will contribute to nonpoint sources of <br /> pollution in the watershed" ; <br /> 3) "The development could significantly compromise the <br /> pristine quality of Morgan Creek" ; and, <br /> 4) 'All of these factors could exacerbate the quality and <br /> eutrophic status of University. Lake , particularly with <br /> regard to nutrient loading, which in turn would <br /> comproimise the quality and use of the Lake as a <br /> drinking water source . " <br /> --The State Environmental Management Commission (EMC) upheld <br /> DEM's decision to reject the Amberly permit. <br /> --The developer of Amberly announced his intention, to redesign <br /> the project to make it "consistent with the <br /> recommendations of the OWASA study. Specifically, he <br /> will submit plans with no more than 1 unit per 5 acres, <br /> reducing the number of houses from 157 to about 40 . <br />