Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-28-1989
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1989
>
Agenda - 06-28-1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2017 4:29:57 PM
Creation date
3/10/2017 4:03:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/28/1989
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
296
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6 <br /> • Will alternative treatment systenis be permitted in the watershed? <br /> • e If alternative treatment systems are permitted in the watershed, the Study <br /> recommends that there should be a publicly-run program of inspection and <br /> monitoring of those systems. Which jurisdiction will take the lead role? Will <br /> OWASA take the lead? (See also Financing) <br /> * If alternative treatment systems are permitted in the watershed,should there <br /> be a set of local design criteria established for such systems? Should the County <br /> Health Departments or OWASA take over the full responsibility for operating such <br /> systems? <br /> • Will the County Health Departments or OWASA take responsibility for a <br /> monitoring and inspections program for conventional septic tank systems? Should <br /> more stringent criteria for these systems be developed,especially if they will be <br /> the predominant method for sewage treatment in the watershed? <br /> • Who will take the lead responsibility for establishing and implementing a water <br /> quality monitoring program in the watershed? <br /> III FINANCING <br /> • How should an inspection and monitoring program for alternative wastewater <br /> systems be financed? Who will take the lead agency role? How will a program for <br /> full public operating responsibility be financed? (See also Utility Service Options) <br /> • How should an inspection and maintenance program for on-site stormwater <br /> BMPs be financed? Who will talc, the lead agency role? (See also Land Use) <br /> * How should a regional stormwater BIVIP program be planned and financed? Who <br /> will take the lead agency role? (See also Land Use) <br /> • • <br /> What will be the impact on the local tax base of the various options set out by <br /> the study? What will be the overall financial implication, given the need to set up <br /> and finance various new programs? <br /> IV TIMING <br /> • Should the jurisdictions identify and set priorities for short-term and long-term <br /> watershed protection strategies? Because many of the possible pieces of the <br /> recommended approach (such as regional stormwater BMPs,and public operation <br /> and maintenance of alternative systems)will take a long time to develop and get <br /> into operation,should there be some phasing in of implementation strategies? For <br /> example, an interim approach could be taken which would require the <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.