Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-12-1989
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1989
>
Agenda - 06-12-1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2017 3:52:50 PM
Creation date
3/10/2017 3:52:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/12/1989
Meeting Type
Special Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
quality of service they now offer and to avoid negatively impacting that, and (3) to stop <br /> subsidizing the insurance companies at the expense of the Orange County taxpayer. This <br /> issue will be successfully resolved if those three goals are reached. <br /> Commissioner Halkiotis stated that he is undecided on the fee for service issue. He <br /> mentioned that the philosophic reasons behind volunteering makes what those people do <br /> very special. He wants to be certain not to do anything to damage that volunteering <br /> spirit. He indicated that this issue needs to be thoroughly studied. He endorsed the <br /> concept of waiting and setting up a task force to look at this issue. He suggested that <br /> the rescue squad workers get insurance information and process the forms themselves. <br /> Chairman Carey pointed out that the user fee issue needs to be resolved so that <br /> implementation would be applicable to the 1989-90 budget. One alternative is to charge a <br /> fee as the Manager has proposed, or to charge a fee for part of the service. Another <br /> solution would be to charge no fee but to put it on the tax bill and designate it as <br /> such. He also indicated that he found it difficult to continue to subsidize insurance <br /> companies. <br /> Commissioner Marshall stated that she felt very strongly in support of the <br /> volunteers. The reason that this issue must be addressed now is because of the Federal <br /> Government and their mandate to the counties about the way they are trying to bring • <br /> services to the poor who do not have insurance. As the County picks up the medicare B <br /> under catastrophic health insurance, and pay medicaid for more women and children, the <br /> money the county must contribute is increased greatly. <br /> Commissioner Wilihoit indicated that one problem is that the fee does not cover the <br /> entire cost. He suggested compiling figures to show what money would be needed if the <br /> fee for service was not implemented and present that at the Public Hearing. He stated <br /> that the hazardous materials team have in the past responded to incidents on 1-85 <br /> involving the transport of hazardous materials. He indicated this type of service does <br /> not need to be subsidized by the county. He asked for a breakdown of the number of EMS <br /> calls on 1-85 as compared to local roads. <br /> Link indicated that he would support the idea of pursuing a separate tax for EMS. <br /> The state statutes provide for there to be a separate EMS district tax Countywide. It <br /> could be specified on the tax bill that 2.6 cents be earmarked for EMS services. Next <br /> year the Commissioners can pursue the alternative of establishing a separate countywide <br /> EMS tax or pursue other alternatives. <br /> Chairman Carey clarified that the proposed user fee is an attempt to recoup part of <br /> the County's direct and indirect costs. The County is not attempting to collect on the <br /> value of the services of the volunteers. <br /> An unidentified volunteer asked for clarification of how raising money through a tax <br /> would work and if it would be earmarked for EMS. <br /> Chairman Carey indicated that it would go to offset those direct and indirect costs <br /> that he just mentioned. <br /> Mr. Herb Barlow of the South Orange Rescue Squad stated he believes the insurance <br /> companies would raise their rates if claims were filed for rescue service. He mentioned <br /> that although the majority of reasons that the rescue squad opposed this idea were <br /> philosophical, he believed there were an equal number of fiscal reasons. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.