Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-05-1989
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1989
>
Agenda - 06-05-1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2017 4:05:29 PM
Creation date
3/10/2017 3:51:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/5/1989
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
218
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7 <br /> -_ -- -- . — _.-� -_--_.-,- •-- --._ �,_ — ---- - .. : - -- DRAFT <br /> lc <br /> changed. Finally, I'm through, I know Orange County fought <br /> 1-40 through that corridor for a long time. It fought it <br /> because it was of the belief that 1-40 would have adverse <br /> environmental impacts. When it became pointless to fight <br /> sacrificed were the people, right along the corridor who got <br /> their property put in the Rural Buffer to be the buffer for <br /> their property put in the Rural buffer to be the buffer for <br /> everyone else. I think I have got to take questions now. <br /> Mr. Carey - Are there any questions for Mr. Fears? <br /> Mr. Carey: Are there any questions for Mr. Phears? <br /> Unidentified Citizen: Mr. Phears you initially purchased <br /> this property in 1987, however, am I correct that in the last <br /> 60 to 90 days you purchased the Blackwood property. <br /> Mr. Phears: That's correct. The Blackwood property was <br /> purchased for the purposed of additional buffer for this plan <br /> precisely, and some of it is to be used, in fact I think the <br /> majority, is to be used for a land application system because <br /> of the absence of water and sewer. <br /> Unidentified Citizen: This looks inconsistent to me. <br /> Mr. Phears: I guess we were optimistic that if we put a <br /> good plan together and we needed the Blackwood property for <br /> land application system, we had to have it. Mr. Blackwood <br /> system, so we bought the property. <br /> Mr. Carey: We have another question, state your name please. <br /> • <br /> Unidentified Citzen: Comment was unintelligible. <br /> Mr. Phears: That's a goad questions because the fact of the <br /> matter is the noise limits that would be applicable to a <br /> - quarry there are lower than what is there right now. If we <br /> get a permit. There is a Special Use permitting process that <br /> #1 requires the buffer two and a half times as big as the <br /> requires the buffer be 2 1/2 times as big as the buffer the <br /> interstate gives us, and. . . . I get to answer this, you asked <br /> -• -• it. <br /> Unidentified Citizen: Comment was unintelligible. <br /> Mr. Phears: That's correct. The level of noise I presume we <br /> measure at your property line and <br /> the larger the buf <br /> fer the <br /> - lower the noise, I'm sure you have some familiarity with <br /> noise as a declining function of distance. . I think it's a <br /> square root. . <br /> Mr. Phears: Let me just say this, the noise. . . . <br /> Mr. Carey: Sir, Sir let me. . .would you please give Mr. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.