Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
3 <br /> 6 <br /> or integrity of the Rural Buffer. (Same as staff recommendation <br /> presented at April 6, 1989 hearing) . <br /> 3) Carrboro Realest: Carrboro requests Services Area boundary, quests an adjustment of the <br /> arisen with the boundary bisecting to eliminate a properties. that has <br /> resulted in properties being hal in the Rural Buffer, half has Transition Area, with jurisdiction for development regulation <br /> split between Carrboro and Orange County. <br /> Departments recommended approving this adjstment. three Planning <br /> Plannin Board's Recommendation: <br /> 1989, the Planning Board voted 4-3 t its meeting of April 18, <br /> .,. McLendon dissenting) to recommend denial of Raney,here Guild, Ms. <br /> Resolution 5B) . The prima quest (see • <br /> Carrboro Transition Area. I justification another 35a acres would be an <br /> unwarranted intrusion into the Rural Buffer. <br /> Manager's Recommendation: We recommend that the Council adopt 5A, approving this re believe reasons <br /> stated by the Town of Carrboro are t reasona ndh that Sthe <br /> adjustment would not damage the concept or integrity of the Rural <br /> Buffer. <br /> Adoption of the alternative, Resolution 58, would deny the <br /> request. <br /> Summa of Recommendations <br /> We recommend that the Council adopt Resolutions 3B, 4A and 5A. <br /> 3B would deny the Envirotek request. <br /> 4A would approve the Cazwell request. <br /> 5A would approve the Carrboro request. <br /> • <br />