Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-05-1989
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1989
>
Agenda - 06-05-1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2017 4:05:29 PM
Creation date
3/10/2017 3:51:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/5/1989
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
218
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> 7 . <br /> approval do address project phasing. The <br /> applicants request is consistent with the <br /> provisions of the Subdivision Regulations <br /> which allow a specific phasing schedule to be 4 <br /> included as part of the Preliminary Plat <br /> approval. <br /> The Planning Staff recommends approval of the <br /> proposed Phasing Plan for Phases 2 and 3 of <br /> Eno River Estates. <br /> MOTION: Eddleman moved approval as recommended by the <br /> Planning Staff. Seconded by Lewis. <br /> VOTE: 8 in favor. <br /> 1 abstained (Yuhasz - due to professional <br /> conflict of interest. ) <br /> AGENDA ITEM #10: MATTERS HEARD AT 4/6/89 JPA PUBLIC HEARING <br /> a. Joint Planning Land Use Plan <br /> DRAFT (1) LUP-4-89 Envirotek, Incorporated <br /> A copy of the abstract is an attachment to <br /> these minutes on pages <br /> Collins summarized as follows: <br /> The Joint Staff recommendation presented at <br /> the public hearing was for denial of the <br /> proposed amendment. Since the public <br /> hearing, both the Planning Board of the Towns <br /> of Chapel Hill and Carrboro have recommended <br /> denial of the proposed amendment. The Joint <br /> Staff recommendation for denial remains the <br /> same as presented at the public hearing. <br /> • Eidenier asked about references in the <br /> minutes that Mr. Wayne Phears made to being <br /> • unaware of the vote about the Rural Buffer <br /> and a meeting being postponed until after <br /> that time. <br /> Jacobs noted that part of the property was <br /> the subject of a lawsuit in which the County <br /> is involved. <br /> Collins indicated the location of the <br /> property in question on the map and responded <br /> that the comments questioned by Eidenier <br /> involve issues related to the lawsuit. <br /> MOTION: Best moved to accept the Planning Staff's <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.