Orange County NC Website
5 <br /> tract. <br /> Eidenier asked about the buildable area on lot 4 <br /> considering the steep slopes and the creek. <br /> Crudup responded that it was not that the lot is <br /> unbuildable but would probably cost more to <br /> develop. She indicated there are building plans <br /> that adjust to such slopes. <br /> There was more discussion about the location of <br /> lot 6 in the alternate Staff plan. <br /> Crudup agreed that the alternate plan was not <br /> unified with lot 6 separated from the other lots <br /> but indicated she still felt this plan more <br /> accurately addressed the concept of a cluster <br /> subdivision. <br /> MOTION: Eddleman moved approval of the original plan <br /> presented by the applicant with the Homeowners <br /> Association to provide easement and tree <br /> protection with no disturbance of the setbacks <br /> and buffers. Seconded by Lewis. <br /> VOTE: 4 in favor. <br /> 4 opposed. <br /> 1 abstained (Yuhasz - due to professional <br /> conflict of interest. ) <br /> MOTION: Best moved approval of the alternate Planning <br /> Staff plan with the deletion of lot 6 which would <br /> reduce septic tank areas and a Class B private <br /> road. Seconded by Jacobs. ' <br /> VOTE: 2 in favor. <br /> 6 opposed. <br /> 1 abstained (Yuhasz - due to professional <br /> conflict of interest. ) <br /> MOTION: Cantrell moved approval of the alternate plan as <br /> presented by the applicant with a Class B Private <br /> Road to serve lots 4, 5 and 6. Seconded by <br /> Lewis. <br /> VOTE: 6 in favor. <br /> • 2 opposed. <br /> 1 abstained (Yuhasz - due to professional <br /> conflict of interest. ) <br /> • <br /> DRAFi b. Preliminary. Plats (27 Lots) <br /> • <br /> (1) Revision of Eno River Estates <br /> (27 Lots - Cedar Grove Township) <br />