Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-05-1989
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1989
>
Agenda - 06-05-1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2017 4:05:29 PM
Creation date
3/10/2017 3:51:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/5/1989
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
218
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- - -_..;._ _:.__.. .. — PAGE 28 6 - <br /> is the Rural Buffer. <br /> Mr. Carey: Other questions? Yes. Did you have a question? <br /> O.R. <br /> Unidentified Citizen: Unintelligible comment. <br /> Mr. Williford: The primary reason is not for the limination <br /> of the Rural Buffer per se, but the Rural Buffer is creating <br /> a jurisdictional boundary which existing lots all along <br /> . the boundary of Duke Forest and in order to remedy that <br /> situation, yes, we're asking that the Rural Buffer be removed <br /> and that many of the features along Duke Forest be retained, <br /> however, such as the set back. <br /> Mr. Carey: Is there a question in the back of the room? <br /> Unidentied Citizen: Comment unintelligible. <br /> Mr. Williford: Yes, there are two issues, one issue would be <br /> to amend the Land Use Plan, joint planning Land Use Plan to <br /> remove the rural buffer and then once that is removed and the <br /> transitional areas are extended. Then that area would have <br /> to be zoned and we're saying that it be zoned the designation <br /> which all the other transition areas to be currently zoned, <br /> which would be RR, in our case, one unit per acre so it would <br /> be a density change. <br /> Unidentified Citizen: Unintelligible Comment. <br /> Mr. Williford: Right. Would be a additional, 67 units over <br /> 135 acres. <br /> Unidentified Citizen:- Unintelligible Comment. <br /> Mr. Williford: The only one we have would not entirely be <br /> consistent, would be in the water shed. We would have to <br /> create another zoning. <br /> • Mr. Carey: Yes sir. <br /> Unidentified Citizen: Unintelligible Comment. <br /> Mr. Williford: It doesn't differ in terms of administrative <br /> problems which we encounter with those splits, it's the same. <br /> A lot split by jurisdictional boundary is to be subjective to <br /> review by, more than one jurisdiction. <br /> Unidentified Citizen: Unintelligible Comment. <br /> Mr. Williford: Excuse me, the extended boundary around the <br /> Rural Buffer? <br /> Unidentified Citizen: Unintelligible Comment. <br /> III <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.