Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-05-1989
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1989
>
Agenda - 06-05-1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2017 4:05:29 PM
Creation date
3/10/2017 3:51:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/5/1989
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
218
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
15 <br /> • <br /> Citizen Comment: Unintelligible comment <br /> Carol Zinn: We could proceed that way and we could also <br /> pursue other avenues to try to get the 28th lot. <br /> Mr. Carey: Other questions? <br /> If this was approved and I'm curious about your other <br /> avenues, but if this was approved would that be a <br /> noncomforming lot. If something was built and there was a <br /> disaster would that be a noncomforming use so that somebody <br /> could not go back and rebuild. <br /> Carol Zinn: I'm not an attorney. I can't answer that <br /> question. I'm sorry. <br /> Mr. Carey: Perhaps, Mr. Collins could answer that question. <br /> Carol Zinn: Or perhaps Mr. Gledhill could. <br /> Unidentifed: Would this form a noncomformative lot, in terms <br /> of insurance and other matters. Would there be a problem in <br /> rebuilding the house if something destroyed it. And if you <br /> don't know the answer we can come back to it later. <br /> Mr. Collins: I can't really address it from an insurance <br /> standpoint in terms of nonconformity standpoint of zoning. <br /> We have two different definitions of a lot within our zoning <br /> ordinance. One is called a zoning lot, if you look at just <br /> that portion of this lot 27 that is in Orange County, it <br /> would be a zoning lot zoned rural buffer and from that <br /> standpoint would be noncomforming. If you look at it from <br /> the Durham County side, they do have a buildable portion in <br /> Durham County and they could built there and not have any <br /> conflict whatsoever with the Orange County rural buffer <br /> provisions. <br /> Unidentified: So the buildable portion of lot, the proposed <br /> lot 28, is in Orange County, i mean is in Durham County and <br /> not in Orange County? <br /> Mr. Collins: No, I'm talkin about lot 27 as a whole now. <br /> Lot 28, if you cut it and leave it rural buffer it would be a <br /> noncomforming lot. <br /> Mr. Carey: I don't have anyone else who have signed up to <br /> speak on this matter, but if there's anyone in here who would <br /> like to do so please come forward. <br /> Cathy Ming: I'm Cathy Kling and I would like to speak in <br /> support of keep your rural buffer. I do think that the <br /> people who border this Montvale development would appreciate <br /> that extra space in the Montvale development as open space <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.