Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-05-1989
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1989
>
Agenda - 06-05-1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2017 4:05:29 PM
Creation date
3/10/2017 3:51:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/5/1989
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
218
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
14 <br /> Mr. Carey: Are there any questions? One question. <br /> Unidentified Citizen: Comment unintelligible. <br /> Carol Zinn: If, lot 28 is separated from lot 27, than it <br /> would be mostly in Orange County part of it would be in <br /> Durham County-Durham City. Actually the curious thing is <br /> that the fellow who we bought this land from never paid taxes <br /> in Orange County always paid Durham taxes, yet he has this <br /> little 6t with 1.45 acres that was in Orange County and his <br /> home is on the site that we want to call lot 28, so his house <br /> was actually in Orange County. <br /> Mr. Carey: Ms. Marshall? Other questions? <br /> Unidentified Citizen: Comment unintelligible. <br /> Carol Zinn: No, we don't have a problem with them. They <br /> just have this little sliver going through and the house site <br /> is in the part that has already been approved by Durham City. <br /> Mr. Carey: Mr. Willhoit. <br /> Don Willhoit: On the lot the house that is to be built <br /> on, whatt school district is it in? <br /> Carol Zinn: Durham. <br /> Mr, Carey: Gentleman, right here, yes. <br /> Unidentified citizen: Did you purchase this land without <br /> knowing that part of it was in Orange County? <br /> Carol Zinn: Yes, I know you think that I should have known <br /> and I should have been but I wasn't. Yes. <br /> Unidentified citizen: Comment unintelligible. <br /> Carol Zinn: Yes, and I think there's a reasonable <br /> explanation for that. The tax maps are not accurate. The <br /> tax map showed a much smaller portion that was in 'Orange <br /> County, much smaller, it didn't look like any problem at all, <br /> and when it was finally surveyed we saw that it was larger <br /> and we were told initially by the Planning Staff and Orange <br /> County by a new employee, I would think, on the Planning <br /> Staff that it was an administrative matter and there was no <br /> problem at all. We went through the whole approval process <br /> with Durham City believing that and then right near the end <br /> when we were about to file our final plat, we found out that <br /> we indeed had a larger problem than we thought. Lot 28, if <br /> you look at what is now 27, that is twice as large as the <br /> other lots in the neighborhood and approximately half the way <br /> coming across the left of that lot, lot 28 would start. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.