Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
38 <br /> recommendation for denial. Seconded by <br /> Eidenier. <br /> VOTE: Unanimous. <br /> Jacobs noted that there were property owners <br /> expressing concern about the devaluation of <br /> their property at the public hearing. He <br /> suggested that they be put in touch with the <br /> Triangle Land Conservancy regarding possible <br /> solutions to their concerns. <br /> (2) LUP-5-89 Cazwell, Incorporated <br /> � Collins noted that both Chapel Hill and <br /> _D Carrboro governing boards have recommended <br /> approval of this amendment. The Joint <br /> Planning Staffs of Orange County, Chapel Hill <br /> and Carrboro also recommend approval. <br /> MOTION: Lewis moved approval as recommended. <br /> Seconded by Yuhasz. <br /> VOTE: Unanimous. <br /> DRAFT (3) LUP-6-89 Town of Carrboro <br /> Presentation by Marvin Collins. <br /> A copy of the agenda abstract is an <br /> attachment to these minutes on pages <br /> The Planning Staffs of Orange County, Chapel <br /> Hill jointly recommend approval of the <br /> request that the 400-foot Rural Suffer area <br /> located between Carrboro's Transition Area II <br /> and Duke Forest be removed and that the area <br /> be designated as Transition Area II on the <br /> • Joint Planning Area Land Use Plan. <br /> Best asked how this affected development. <br /> Collins responded that there were two <br /> different zoning designations - one for <br /> Carrboro and one for Orange County. <br /> Properties split by the boundary must deal <br /> with two jurisdictions and two sets of <br /> development standards. <br /> Jacobs asked about the proposed amendment to <br /> the Transition Area Zoning Plan. Collins <br /> responded that if the Board of Commissioners <br /> approves the Land Use Plan Amendment, then <br /> the County could also act on the proposed <br /> zoning plan for the area; i.e. , designate the <br />