Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-30-1989
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1989
>
Agenda - 05-30-1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2017 3:44:40 PM
Creation date
3/10/2017 3:44:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/30/1989
Meeting Type
Special Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ansmnummesufflim <br /> , <br /> reflect their hours of time, training, equipment, and facilities to show what a total <br /> EMS system costs. They also take issue with the timing of the study and the <br /> implementation, believing that July 1st is too quick for implementation. They also <br /> take philosophical issue with charging a fee for volunteer time and use of rescue <br /> squad equipment. They believe that fees will cause contributions to diminish. There <br /> are other issues, but these are some of the major ones. <br /> Link reviewed other increases for the upcoming year. The largest increases go <br /> toward schools, and debt service. Other increases are in the areas of human <br /> services, public works, public safety, outside agencies, and general administration. <br /> Economic Development is a high priority for the county and the implementation of the <br /> Economic Development Strategic Plan is being recommended. That will require funds <br /> for additional staff to help accomplish those goals. In the Public Works Department <br /> recommendations include a solid waste manager, and a building and grounds supervisor, <br /> to enhance the solid waste program. At the same time the tipping fees will be <br /> increased. In Public Safety the implementation of Phase II of the DARE program, and <br /> the addition of a Deputy Emergency Services Director, has been recommended. The <br /> Social Services Department is expanding public assistance programs due to mandated <br /> program enhancements. Specifically, two Public Assistance case workers, and a nurse <br /> supervisor for the in-home care program, are being recommended. These new positions <br /> are being recommended for the Health Department. The Animal Control Officer, Public <br /> Health Nurse-Family Planning Clinics, and a Social worker (part-time) to coordinate <br /> "baby love" program are also being recommended. Personnel is being recommended for <br /> two new positions to assist in the Classification Study and to administer the <br /> Employee Training and Development program. In the General Administration the <br /> creation of a Budget Office is being recommended. That office will operate as an arm <br /> of the Manager's office. <br /> The recommendation for the education budgets is for a per student increase from <br /> $967 to $1042. This is a 10% increase in county funding for schools current expense. <br /> The recommendation also includes using the discretionary capital funds for removal of <br /> asbestos in both school systems. The issue of school equity has been studied over <br /> the last year. Agreement has been reached on definitions and objectives. A <br /> financial model has been reached by county staff and will be presented. The goal is <br /> to reach equity within 5 or 6 years. The goal is to reach funding equity only, not <br /> programmatic equity. Funding will never be exactly the same and a 4% to 5% variance <br /> is thought to be acceptable. In pursuing equity, it needs to be clear that the <br /> taxpayers in Orange County will pay more taxes during the course of this effort. <br /> That's fair because they will be achieving a greater increase in funding during the <br /> same time. A special District Tax could address the question of equity. This tax <br /> would be applied to the entire county. The county tax could be raised as the Chapel <br /> Hill special tax is lowered. The Manager's proposal would call for a 10% increase in <br /> county..funds each year over the next 5 or 6 years. Mr. Link indicated this was his <br /> recommendation and did not necessarily reflect the agreement of the two school <br /> superintendents. <br /> Ms. Liston provided a more detailed explanation of the Manager's proposal. She <br /> also discussed the financial model. The assumptions that were used in this model <br /> constantly change and need to be discussed here. One is that the County funding <br /> increases at 10% each year and State funding increases at 13% each year. Chapel Hill <br /> district tax dollars have been projected to remain constant at 4.2 million dollars <br /> for this year and as the tax base increases the tax rate will decrease. It was <br /> assumed that Chapel Hill students will increase at a rate of 4% each year and Orange <br /> County students will increase at a rate of 2% each year. The assumption also <br /> included County and State funds being adjusted by these numbers. Countywide tax <br /> increases will be necessary for increases in school funding above and beyond 6%. We <br /> have estimated a countywide increase of 10%. This model will need to be constantly <br /> revised. The percent increases in school funding per student was discussed. Orange <br /> county will receive a greater increase in order to make progress toward equity. By <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.