Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-30-1989
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1989
>
Agenda - 05-30-1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2017 3:44:40 PM
Creation date
3/10/2017 3:44:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/30/1989
Meeting Type
Special Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Another issue facing the county is solid waste. The budget addresses solid <br /> waste concerns in several ways. First, a new Solid Waste Administrator is being <br /> recommended in the budget. That person will provide direct supervision in overseeing <br /> long term solutions to the green box situation. This position will also focus on <br /> public education and the expansion of recycling in Orange County. An increase in the <br /> tipping fee is also a part of the proposed budget. The State and federal regulations <br /> requiring that the landfill be lined is the reason for this increase. Eighty Three <br /> Thousand is in the budget to purchase consolidated green box sites for the coming <br /> year. <br /> The third major goal was diversifying and expanding the County's revenue base. <br /> Link indicated that throughout the budget process he has been impressed with the need <br /> for Orange County to expand its revenue base. Moving ahead with the Economic <br /> Development Strategic plan is a necessary step to achieve that goal. Funding for <br /> implementation of the major components of that plan will be provided. Implementation <br /> of the User Fee Study is also recommended. He indicated that he believes there is a <br /> need to address the issue of which services will be provided through ad valorem tax <br /> revenue as opposed to other sources of revenue, such as fees. <br /> Link stated the County continues to improve its overall financial condition. <br /> The fund balance is at a level sufficient to allow for normal cash flow needs, and <br /> the bond rating is AA. That has allowed for a favorable rate of interest of 7. 11% on <br /> the recent 11.8 million dollar bond issue. In the recommended budget there is a <br /> continuation to attain the goal of 8% fund balance which will be approximately 3.5 <br /> million dollars. That represents $500,000 in additional fund balance. <br /> There is a visible slow down in the rate of growth in the tax base, from an <br /> average of 6.5% to 3.6% for 1989-90. That difference equates to 2 cents on the tax <br /> rate. Much of the reason for this decline is due to the loss of the Inventory Tax. <br /> Personal property has also been eroded. There has been a decrease in construction. <br /> There is a need to expand the tax base through economic development. The Strategic <br /> Plan will need to be pursued in order to reach the goal of expanding the County's tax <br /> base. Other revenue sources need to be pursued, such as user fees. The alternative <br /> to the expansion of the tax base is to continue to raise taxes by 2 -3 cents per year <br /> just to maintain current levels of service. Of the tax increase 3.1 cents will go to <br /> debt service on the bond issue and 2.4 cents for other operating costs. <br /> Figures from the User Fee Study were presented at this time. A potential of <br /> $906,000 in increased revenue was identified and the Manager's Proposed budget <br /> recommends an increase of $484,500. A breakdown of the potential increase in user <br /> fees indicated the largest increase will come from EMS with the remaining increases <br /> coming from Environmental Health, Recreation and Parks, Planning, and Land Records. <br /> He stated that the question concerning.the EMS services was whether or not Orange <br /> County would continue to pay for these services totally with property tax, or pursue <br /> a mixture of property tax and user fees in the future. A breakdown of the County <br /> subsidy is as follows: <br /> County Subsidy of Volunteer Services $105,000 <br /> County Subsidy of Daytime Services 613,000 <br /> Total $718,000 <br /> Tax Rate Equivalent 2.1 cents <br /> Link indicated that the revenue from fees would generate $244,000 for the first <br /> year. The approach recommended would reduce the amount of tax burden to $519,000. <br /> Most of the revenue would be produced through private insurance and <br /> Medicaid/Medicare. Only a small portion of private citizens would be directly billed <br /> and in those cases payment would be based on ability to pay. Some of the EMS <br /> volunteers take issue with the study because it does not reflect their contributions <br /> and resources to the EMS system. They believe that a complete analysis should <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.