Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-24-1989
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1989
>
Agenda - 05-24-1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2017 3:44:41 PM
Creation date
3/10/2017 3:31:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/24/1989
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
134
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
to an informed citizens watch group which effectively spoke for the rural Orange <br /> County community. She stated that the members of SCRAP researched the environmental <br /> impact of the airport, as well as the legal rights of property owners to sue airport <br /> owners and management for noise annoyances. She indicated that SCRAP members felt the <br /> information found in the Task Force Survey and Consultant's report was misleading and <br /> superficial. Lastly, she thanked the Commissioners for their recent flexibility and <br /> sensitivity to the voice of the people. <br /> MS. FRANCIS DOUGLASS presented a plan to channel the energies of the <br /> neighborhoods across Orange County who were involved in the SCRAP effort into the <br /> Economic Development Plan and Rural Character Study. She proposed the Orange <br /> Multi-Neighborhood Information Network (OMNI). The purpose of the network would be to <br /> promote, maintain and enhance the quality, stability and vitality of the residential <br /> neighborhoods in Orange County. The OMNI network would research and take positions on <br /> issues affecting any member neighborhood, and would collect and distribute information , <br /> to stimulate awareness and interest in those issues. A neighborhood will be defined <br /> as an ongoing, private, formal and representative organization, from a defined <br /> geographic area, composed of at least 40 households and accounting for at least 15% of <br /> the households in the area, the purpose of which is not inconsistent with that of the <br /> network. There will be one voting representative elected, or appointed, by the <br /> governing body of each neighborhood, as well as one alternative representative. Other <br /> members of the neighborhood will be encouraged to serve on committees of the network. <br /> Ms. Douglass requested that citizens interested in participating in OMNI indicate that <br /> by signing their name on the sign-up sheet. <br /> MS. TERESE WEAVER spoke in opposition to the airport. She stated that her family <br /> had been residents of Orange County for five generations and that our area, and our <br /> ability to attract desired economic development, is truly unique. She mentioned that <br /> she worked with SCRAP on the financial analysis of the airport. Finding long-term <br /> solutions to the County's economic problems is very difficult. She stated that Orange <br /> County citizens are an important resource and need to be included in the process of <br /> finding these solutions. She volunteered to help Orange County government pursue the <br /> goals which have been established. <br /> MS. MADELINE LEVINE mentioned that she had earlier addressed the Commissioners at <br /> a Rural Character meeting. She stated that she believed the process followed in <br /> pursuing the airport was flawed. Communication was lacking between the Commissioners <br /> and the citizens. An example of poor communication was that the Report to ehe People <br /> did not include the plans for an airport. The economic goals proposed to be reached <br /> through the construction of an airport were not articulated early in the process. <br /> Also, the survey mentioned by Ron Kumin convinced her that the Commissioners were not <br /> listening closely enough to the citizens. She did, however, agree with Commissioner <br /> Willhoit that the vote on the airport should have been delayed until after the Public <br /> Hearings. She stated that the questions that need to be answered are "why do we not <br /> have water and utilities and job training programs in place". She suggested using <br /> local citizens as volunteer consultants to come up with ways to attract desirable <br /> commercial enterprises. Finally, she suggested that the Commissioners need to be more <br /> in touch with what State Agencies, including UNC, plan for the county. Initially, it <br /> was assumed that UNC would be closing the Horace Williams Airport. However, that now <br /> turns out to be untrue. Also, Sunday's Chapel Hill Herald mentioned that the head of <br /> the Division of Airport Transportation at NCDOT said that if the Commissioners go <br /> ahead and decide on an airport then the State will go ahead and ask the FAA to <br /> designate the Orange County Airport as a "reliever airport" for RDU. She felt that <br /> this was frightening. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.