Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-24-1989
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1989
>
Agenda - 05-24-1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2017 3:44:41 PM
Creation date
3/10/2017 3:31:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/24/1989
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
134
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
, . <br /> t. . . <br /> I <br /> vocational, school. Examples of skills taught at such schools are clock repair, men's <br /> tailoring and car upholstery. Her final suggestion was for Orange County to have what <br /> she called an Honor's Pull-Out program which would be associated with the high <br /> schools. This would be a half-day program for the better students who wish to get <br /> advanced placement in jobs such as radio broadcasting, ballet, or commercial art. <br /> MR. RON KUMIN, a member of SCRAP, presented the Commissioners with several more <br /> petitions in opposition to the airport. He stated that he had spoken to Julie <br /> Andresen and Mary Waldorf and he assured them that SCRAP does not support the <br /> extension or expansion of the Horace Williams Airport. He offered to help the Town of <br /> Chapel Hill in any way possible to keep Horace Williams as it is. He mentioned that <br /> in April of 1988 the Orange County Commissioners contacted Independent Opinion <br /> Research and Communications and had a public opinion survey done. The result of the <br /> survey was that of the things Orange County citizens believed were needed in the <br /> County, the least needed was an airport. Only 10% believed it was important and 55% <br /> said it was not important at all. The poll did indicate an overwhelming support for <br /> new and better schools in Chapel Hill and the County at-large. He mentioned that he <br /> had met with Commissioner Hartwell, Commissioner Carey, and Commissioner Willhoit on <br /> different occasions in the past weeks. He indicated that he had learned a great deal <br /> about the County's economic needs. He suggested that the county tap into the human <br /> resources which have been brought out in opposition to the airport. These citizens <br /> could help in the creation of jobs and an economic policy, which would help to build a <br /> better economic base. He challenged the SCRAP organization to remain active and help <br /> the County build the economic base. He stated that he personally was willing to <br /> devote time to help solve the problem. , <br /> Chairman Carey mentioned that there were sign-up sheets in the front of the room <br /> so that citizens could volunteer to serve on the Economic Development Task Forces, <br /> and/or the Rural. Character Committees. <br /> MR. MICHAEL SALEM', a UNC Economic's Professor and a Chapel Hill resident, stated <br /> that he had no vested interest in this issue. Be was asked by a friend to look at the <br /> Consultant's report. He stated that this report seriously overstated the economic <br /> benefits of the proposed airport. He believes they double counted by not counting <br /> activity that would be deleted from Horace Williams and treating it as if it were new <br /> activity in the County. He indicated that as a result of the initial double-counting <br /> that jobs, earnings and tax revenues were also overstated by the Consultant's report. <br /> He does not believe that an increase in industrial aviation will promote industrial <br /> growth. The consultants declined to make that claim and he has not seen it documented <br /> elsewhere. He stated that before public monies are spent, it needs to be well <br /> established that they will achieve the intended objective and he doesn't believe that <br /> evidence is available. He mentioned that the benefit of increased safety in the area <br /> surrounding the Horace Williams airport needed to be weighed against the cost of <br /> relocating the airport. He believes that the answer to the issue of safety depends on <br /> what would be done with the Horace Willimmq property if the airport was relocated. <br /> Potential activities on that property which would increase road traffic could greatly <br /> increase the risk of traffic fatalities to our citizens. His final point was that <br /> much of the development around Horace Williams' airport post-dates the airport. <br /> People moved there freely. He feels that requesting public monies to improve their 1 <br /> benefit is unfair. He agrees with previous speakers that the issue needs to be the <br /> economic development of the County. • <br /> BELLINA VERONESI, a member of SCRAP, spoke in opposition to the airport. She I <br /> read a statement which chronicled the growth of SCRAP from a group of angry citizens <br /> I , <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.