Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-22-1989
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1989
>
Agenda - 05-22-1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2017 3:37:50 PM
Creation date
3/10/2017 3:18:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/22/1989
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
307
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
35 <br /> completely surrounded by the Ten Year <br /> Transition designation. <br /> c. A correction of an error or omission; <br /> (No error or omission has been cited.) <br /> d. Revisions to any factual or descriptive <br /> material. <br /> (This provision is not applicable. ) <br /> 3. Article 20.3.2 also requires the submission of the <br /> following information: <br /> a. A fully-dimensioned map at a scale of not less than <br /> one hundred (100) feet to the inch showing the land <br /> which would be covered by the proposed amendment, <br /> and a legal description of the land. <br /> The applicant has provided the map and legal <br /> description. <br /> b. The manner in which the proposed amendment will <br /> carry out the intent and purpose of the adopted <br /> Comprehensive Plan. <br /> The applicant contends that this amendment would <br /> carry out the intent and purpose of the Plan since <br /> it lies within an area designated by the Town of <br /> Hillsborough as being within its Future Service <br /> Area, and an area that has seen a number of new <br /> residential developments over the past 20 years. <br /> The applicant also bases his contention on the fact <br /> that many of the same attributes that made Ten Year <br /> Transition a correct designation for the previous <br /> University Station Associates amendment are present <br /> also for his proposed amendment. Lastly, the <br /> applicant does make mention of possible <br /> consideration for Planning Unit Development <br /> allowing a more comprehensive approach to <br /> development of the area. <br /> COMPARISON WITH LOCATIONAL STANDARDS <br /> In an analysis of a Comprehensive Plan amendment, the <br /> requested designation is evaluated for compatibility with the <br /> applicable Locational Criteria in Section 3.4 of the Land Use <br /> Element of the Comprehensive Plan. In the section below, <br /> COLLIES means that the area being evaluated is compatible <br /> with the locational critieria. DOES NOT COMPLY means that it <br /> is not compatible. Additional explanation is provided where <br /> the response is not clear-cut. <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.