Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-22-1989
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1989
>
Agenda - 05-22-1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2017 3:37:50 PM
Creation date
3/10/2017 3:18:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/22/1989
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
307
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> • <br /> 2 <br /> • <br /> The Orange County Water and Sewer Policy, adopted April 3 , <br /> 1919 , states that : <br /> • <br /> "Watershed protection should be given a high priority in <br /> any activity related' to 'land use planning in Orange <br /> County. Orange County will, in' those areas for which it <br /> has . planning and zoning jurisdiction and authority, use <br /> this authority. to designate protected watersheds in the <br /> Land Use Element of the Comprehensive' Plan for the <br /> purpose of protecting. those areas from environmental <br /> impacts adverse to water supply sources ." <br /> _ <br /> I believe that both the Planning Board and Board of <br /> Commissioners are seriously , concerned with protecting <br /> University Lake and other water supply sources . <br /> The Camp Dresser & McKee report , conducted specifically ' for <br /> the University Lake watershed, recommends that development be <br /> permitted in the watershed - but under rather strict criteria. <br /> Their favored recommendation is for low density residential <br /> development , not greater than one dwelling unit per five acres, <br /> with a maximum impervious surface limit of four percent . <br /> • <br /> CDM' s second choice is clustered development , with a half-acre <br /> minimum lot size , but an .overall density of five acres per lot , <br /> and with the same four percent impervious limit . The third <br /> approach would be two-acre ' lots , , limited to six percent <br /> impervious coverage , but with publicly maintained stormwater <br /> ponds . The McLennan' s Farm project meets none of these <br /> criteria. <br /> ' Both reports highlight the need for public management' of <br /> community wastewater systems . The County' s Water & Sewer <br /> Policy explicitly commits "to explore alternative institutional <br /> arrangements for shifting the operation and maintenance of such <br /> * systeuts into the public dditi-ain." - - - <br /> The McLennan' s Farm proposal has similarities with earlier <br /> plans submitted for the controversial Amberly subdivision near - - <br /> Carrboro. Both projects would rely on unproven, innovative <br /> community low-pressure systems with no oversight by local <br /> public agencies . Both projects would exceed by a wide margin <br /> the density and impervious surface limits recommended by Camp <br /> Dresser & McKee . And, neither McLennan' s Farm nor Amberly would <br /> include publicly operated and, maintained stormwater devices . <br /> As. . recently as May 11 , the . North Carolina Environmental <br /> Management Commission directed its staff to stop issuing <br /> discharge or non-discharge wastewater permits in WS-I <br /> watersheds until the Commission, could better define an <br /> appropriate level of development for such protected areas . <br /> • <br /> . . <br /> • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.