Orange County NC Website
- - - - - - - <br /> - 42 <br /> Mr. Marvin E. Collins <br /> May 3, 1989 <br /> Page 2 <br /> • <br /> suggestion that OWASA be the lead agency for such a program. The <br /> Hazen and Sawyer report states: "If the reliability of alternative <br /> ' treatment systems is to be improved, it is clear that the greatest <br /> opportunity lies in the area of improved operations and <br /> maintenance." The report goes on to suggest that the County <br /> consider taking over the responsibility for operating and <br /> maintaining alternative systems. The County's April 3, 1989 Watet <br /> & Sewer Policy notes that "adequate long-term operation of such <br /> [alternative] systems must be assured," and states the County's <br /> intent to "evaluate the feasibility of establishing an inspection <br /> and monitoring program for alternative wastewater treatment <br /> systems"; to "explore a' bonding requirement"; and, "to explore <br /> alternative institutional, arrangements for shifting the operation <br /> and maintenance of such systems into the public domain." . <br /> OWASA staff considers it premature to issue a Special Use Permit for <br /> McLennan's Farm before the County fulfills those recently adopted <br /> policy commitments. The applicant's present proposal for a private <br /> vendor to post a $10,000 bond, and to operate the community LPP <br /> system through a contract with the homeowners' association does not <br /> provide adequate assurance of reliable long-term performance. Ten <br /> thousand dollars will not begin to cover the repair costs for the <br /> types of problems noted in the Hazen and Sawyer report. <br /> It is evident to OWASA staff that there now exists a substantially <br /> greater body of technical information and policy consensus than <br /> there was 15 months ago-when we last reviewed the McLennan's Farm <br /> project. The proposed wastewater system still suffers from two <br /> major deficiencies: <br /> • <br /> • The lack of an institutional arrangement to assure reliable <br /> long-term operation and maintenance by a public entity; and, <br /> • The risk of an unproven, innovative technology in an <br /> • environmentally sensitive water supply watershed. <br /> • <br /> Overall Site Plan Considerations <br /> Camp Dresser & McKee's final University Lake Watershed Study report <br /> includes policy and administrative recommendations based on their <br /> technical analysis of the water quality effects of different land <br /> use scenarios. From a water quality standpoint, CDM's preferred <br /> . approach is a 5-acre minimum residential lot size and a 4 percent <br /> impervious surface limit throughout the watershed. Such a pattern <br /> would not require structural stormwater controls (wet ponds) to meet <br /> the recommended University Lake water quality goals. <br />