Agenda - 05-16-1989 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

PAGE 9 PU BEIC HEAR ING MINUTES 272 7/89 he be allowed to stay in the GC-4 zoning classifications and be allowed to operate his business and make a living. • Ms. Carol Tingley, representing the Division of Parks and Recreation, stated - concern about the implications of this proposed land use change. The Eno River State • Park is very close to this property. Some of the 25 acres is adjacent to land which is proposed for acquisition in the master plan for the Park. Any type of high- intensity:commercial or industrial use at this location could be detrimental to the 3 park. Facilities which could result in excessive noise, polluted runoff, smoke, 1 odors, or. tall buildings would significantly reduce public enjoyment of the river and - the park. Although Mr. Kennedy's plans may not change, changing the Land Use Plan :leaves the door open to future development of this kind. The County's current Land Use Plan is very clear that this particular quadrant of the intersection should be treated differently than the other quadrants because of its proximity to the park. The existing Land Use Plan indicates that the areas including the park and the river should be protected from adverse development pressures. In referencing the activity node at the 1-85 and U.S. 70 interchange, the plan indicates that the Eno River State , Park, as well as the flood plain along the Eno River, are located north of this interchange and therefore industrial and commercial development should be confined to the area south and east of the interchange. In a letter to the Division of Parks and Recreation last March, the County indicated its commitment to maintain the land use designation in the Land Use Plan which will provide low density, non-intensive uses • • around the parks periphery.' She asked that the Land Use Plan not be changed. However, if this amendment is approved it needs to include a provision to protect this land from future intensive uses which are not a part of the present proposal but which could be available. to a land owner if the Land Use Plan is changed. Examples would -- include a limit on buildini.heighf, protections from noise and excessive lighting, ' . -e Garry 1.7: Dean' of Ratite 1; Dove Creek Road in Orange County spoke in support of . Kennedy:sirequest stating the land was sold to him as GC4 and he should be able - • • . . • • to use and maintain it as GC4.!-:. - . . . • ' - • , - - THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS .CLOSED:, Commissioner Marshall- stated that the Board of Commissioners are in agreement that when the County makes a mistake it must do everything possible to correct the mistake without hurting the property owner. The Board of Commissioners did agree on another approach that will be presented later on the agenda that would certainly show respect for the State Parkland and the Board's commitment to that quadrant. . - • . • • . • ' A motion was made by Commissioner Willhoit,. seconded by Commissioner Halkiotis; to refer this matter to the Planning Board for a recommendation to be presented to the ' Board of Commissioners no sooner than April 3rd, .1989. • - VOTE: UNANIMOUS • . - • • • c. - LIT-3-89 University Station Associates - (Rural Residential/Agricultural/Resource Conservation to 10-Year Transition) The presentation was made by Marvin Collins. In summary this item is to receive citizen comment on a proposed amendment to the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan submitted by University Station Associates. The property is located south of the Southern Railroad on both sides of Old N.C. • •