Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-16-1989
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1989
>
Agenda - 05-16-1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2017 3:26:43 PM
Creation date
3/10/2017 3:06:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/16/1989
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
252
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ai/157/4 <br /> ORANGE COUNTY <br /> HILLSBOROUGH <br /> NORTH CAROLINA <br /> anaaes's C ie�e s 'isru.l 1752 <br /> May 19, 1989 <br /> Mr. Robert Morgan, Town Manager <br /> Town of Carrboro <br /> 301 West Main Street <br /> Carrboro, North Carolina 27510 <br /> Dear Bob: <br /> At its May 16, 1989 meeting, the Orange County Board of <br /> Commissioners considered a proposed Carrboro Land Use <br /> Ordinance text amendment. The proposed amendment would <br /> require a 100-foot undisturbed setback along all Carrboro <br /> Transition Area II property bordering lands designated <br /> Public/Private Open Space on the Joint Planning Area Land Use <br /> Plan. <br /> As you are aware, the proposed amendment is related to two <br /> Carrboro requests. The first is to amend the Joint Planning <br /> Area Land Use Plan to change the designation of a 400-foot <br /> strip of Rural Buffer adjacent to Duke Forest to Transition <br /> Area II. The second is to rezone the 400-foot strip from <br /> Orange County Rural Buffer to Carrboro Rural Residential. The <br /> proposed amendment to the Carrboro Land Use Ordinance is <br /> contingent upon the Board of Commissioners approval of both <br /> requests. They will be considered by the Board at its June 5, <br /> 1989 meeting. <br /> While the Board of Commissioners did not object to the <br /> proposed amendment due to inconsistency ' <br /> istency with the Joint <br /> Planning Area Land Use Plan, it <br /> g did express on <br /> c cern ou <br /> ab t the <br /> 100-foot buffer concept. A similiar proposal was presented - <br /> at public. hearing recently by Orange County. It drew <br /> considerable opposition from property owners adjoining Public <br /> Interest Districts where <br /> the 100-foot buffer would be <br /> required. Specific concerns identified at the County hearing <br /> were as follows: <br /> 1. The application of buffer requirements to adjoining <br /> property but not the the site to be protected; and <br /> 2. The desire of "public interest" properties to be treated <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.