Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-16-1989
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1989
>
Agenda - 05-16-1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2017 3:26:43 PM
Creation date
3/10/2017 3:06:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/16/1989
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
252
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 <br /> MEMORANDUM <br /> STONEYCREEK NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION <br /> t <br /> TO: Moses Carey, Jr., Chairman Orange City Commission <br /> Stephen H. Halkiotis <br /> John Hartwell <br /> Shirley E. Marshall <br /> Don Willhoit <br /> FROM: Joe Woodman, President SNA <br /> Calle Warner, Vice President SNA <br /> Clint Burklin, Chairman SNA <br /> DATE: May 16, 1989 <br /> SUBJECT: University Station Associates Proposal <br /> We have met with the residences of Stoneycreek Neighborhood several <br /> times and once with the University Station Associates to discuss their need <br /> to change the Orange County Land Use Plan. This memorandum presents the <br /> recommendations of Stoneycreek,Neighborhood based on those meetings. <br /> The area along Old N.C. 10 being considered for redesignation as <br /> transition area in the Land Use Plan is a very unique area. While it is <br /> bordered on one side by Railroad tracks and has some regions of poor soils, JI <br /> the area also contains a mile stretch of scenic Stoneycreek and some ` <br /> environmentally sensitive low lands. <br /> With the uniqueness of this area in mind, Stoneycreek Neighborhood <br /> Association requests that you not redesignate the Old N.C. 10 - New Hope <br /> Church Rd junction as transition area at this time, for the following <br /> reasons: 1: <br /> 1. The area in question is 3 miles from Hillsborough and would <br /> essentially represent a satellite transition area. However, this <br /> transition area is not needed to meet Hillsborough's growth <br /> requirements. <br /> 1 <br /> RECETURn conm <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.