Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
• <br /> 7• - <br /> . • . <br /> PAGE 25 <br /> 1 Control Officer prior to issuance of a building permit, the Building Inspector should <br /> 2 be included in that requirement. He also indicated that Ms. Johnson believes that <br /> 3 some thought should be given to the manner in which enforcement of the ordinance will <br /> 4 be carried out. <br /> 5 <br /> 6 Rayford Mayes indicated that he applied for a Class II kennel permit last year. <br /> 7 Ms. Johnson inspected his kennel and indicated that it was an excellent kennel in <br /> 8 every way. He asked what he will have to do to get this extra permit. <br /> 9 <br /> 10 Jacobs indicated that he would not need to do anything to be in compliance. An <br /> 11 existing facility would not do anything unless it expands. <br /> 12 <br /> 13 THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br /> 14 • <br /> 15 A motion was made by Commissioner Halkiotis, seconded by Commissioner Hartwell,: <br /> 16 to refer this matter to the Planning Board for a recommendation to be returned to the <br /> 17 Board of Commissioners no sooner than April 3, 1989. <br /> 18 <br /> 19 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> 20 <br /> 21 c. Solid Waste Container Sites <br /> 22 (1) Art. 4.1 - Establishment of Use Regulations <br /> 23 (2) Art. 6.16 -Additional Requirements for Certain Permitted Uses <br /> 24 No presentation was made. In summary this item is to receive public <br /> 25 comment on a proposal to include solid waste disposal collection sites as a use <br /> 26 permitted by right in all zones, subject to minimum design standards. The proposal <br /> 27 amendment seeks to permit solid waste collection sites with a minimum lot size of <br /> 28 40,000 square feet in all zones. Specific site development standards are also <br /> 29 proposed. <br /> 30 <br /> THERE WERE NO QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS. <br /> 31 <br /> 32 <br /> A motion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded by Commissioner Halkiotis to <br /> 33 <br /> 34 refer this item to the Planning Board for a recommendation to be returned to the Board <br /> of Commissioner no sooner than April 3, 1989. <br /> 5 <br /> 36 VOTE: UNANIMOUS. <br /> 37 <br /> 38 d. Mobile Home Parks <br /> 39 (1) Art. 22 - Definitions <br /> 40 (2) Art. 7.20.2 - Planned Developments/Mobile Home Parks <br /> 41 • The presentation was made 'by Marvin Collins. In summary this item is to <br /> 42 receive citizen comment on the proposed amendments to Article 7.20.2 (Area <br /> 43 ' Requirements for Establishment of District) and Article 22 (Definitions) of the Zoning <br /> 44 Ordinance by clearly identifying a size limit for mobile home parks and to make the <br /> 45 definition of "mobile home park" in Article 22 consistent with 7.20.2. This would <br /> 46 change the cap on mobile home parks from 50 acres to 50 units. <br /> 47 <br /> • <br /> 58 THERE WERE NO QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSIONERS OR PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS <br /> 49 <br /> THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED FOR PUBLIC COMMENT <br /> 50 <br /> 51 <br /> Sheryl Moody asked if this amendment applied to new as well as old parks and <br /> 52 Collins indicated that it applied to new parks only. <br /> 53 <br /> 54 <br /> 55 <br />