Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
15 • . <br /> PAGE 25 <br /> 1 Control Officer prior to issuance of a building permit, the Building Inspector should <br /> 2 be included in that requirement. He also indicated that Ms. Johnson believes that <br /> 3 some thought should be given to the manner in which enforcement of the ordinance will <br /> 4 be carried out. <br /> 5 <br /> 6 Rayford Mayes indicated that he applied for a Class II kennel permit last year. <br /> 7 Ms. Johnson inspected his kennel and indicated that it was an excellent kennel in <br /> 8 every way. He asked what he will have to do to get this extra permit. <br /> 9 <br /> 10 Jacobs indicated that he would not need to do anything to be in compliance. An <br /> 11 existing facility would not do anything unless it expands. <br /> 12 <br /> 13 THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br /> 14 <br /> 15 A motion was made by Commissioner Halkiotis, seconded by Commissioner Hartwell,. <br /> 16 to refer this matter to the Planning Board for a recommendation to be returned to the <br /> 17 Board of Commissioners no sooner than April 3, 1989. <br /> 18 . <br /> 19 VOTE: UNANIMOUS . . . <br /> 20 <br /> 21 c. Solid Waste Container Sites . <br /> 22 (1) Art. 4.1 - Establishment of Use Regulations <br /> 23 (2) Art. 6.16 -Additional Requirements for Certain Permitted Uses <br /> 24 No presentation was made. In summary this item is to receive public <br /> 29 comment on a proposal to include solid waste disposal collection sites as a use <br /> 26 permitted by right in all zones, subject to minimum design standards. The proposal <br /> 27 amendment seeks to permit solid waste collection sites with a minimum lot size of <br /> 28 . 40,000 square feet in all zones: Specific site development standards are also • <br /> 29. proposed. <br /> 30 <br /> 31 THERE WERE NO QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS. <br /> 32 - <br /> 33 A motion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded by Commissioner Halkiotis to <br /> z4 refer this item to the Planning Board for a recommendation to be returned to the Board <br /> '; of Commissioner no sooner than April 3, 1989. <br /> 36 VOTE: UNANIMOUS. <br /> 37 <br /> 38 d. Mobile Home Parks <br /> 39 ' (1) Art. 22 - Definitions <br /> 40 (2) Art. 7.20.2 - Planned Developments/Mobile Home Parks <br /> 41 The, presentation was made by Marvin Collins. In summary this item is to <br /> 42 receive citizen comment on the proposed amendments to Article 7.20.2 (Area <br /> 42 Requirements for Establishment of District) and Article 22 (Definitions) of the Zoning <br /> 44 Ordinance by clearly identifying a size limit for mobile home parks and to make the <br /> 45 definition of "mobile home park" in Article 22 consistent with 7.20.2. This would <br /> change the cap on mobile home parks from 50 acres to 50 units. <br /> 47 ' . • <br /> THERE WERE NO QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSIONERS OR PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS <br /> 58 <br /> 43 <br /> THE PUBLIC HEARING VAS OPENED FOR PUBLIC COMMENT <br /> 51) . <br /> 1 51 Sheryl Moody asked if this amendment applied to new as well as old parks and <br /> 52 Collins indicated that it applied to new parks only. <br /> 53 <br /> 54 ' <br /> 55 <br /> . • . . <br /> ... <br />