Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-16-1989
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1989
>
Agenda - 05-16-1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2017 3:26:43 PM
Creation date
3/10/2017 3:06:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/16/1989
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
252
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
000C,X,... MINUTES Or 12/1.10A3E3 <br /> - . P <br /> distributed. - <br /> • <br /> 7„. ITEMS FOR DECISION - cONSENT AGENDA <br /> . 1. CONTINUATION OF THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE WATER/SEWER POLICY JANUARY 17 <br /> Motion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded by Commissioner-Halkiotis to <br /> approve continuing the public hearing on the proposed Water/Sewer Policy to <br /> January 17, 1989 in conjunction with the regular Commissioners meeting at 7:30 <br /> p.m. in the Courtroom of the Post Office on East Franklin Street in Chapel Hill. <br /> Following the conclusion of the public hearing, the draft policy as presented at <br /> the November 28 hearing and all comments, both written and verbal, received <br /> since that date will be referred to the Planning Board for recommendation on <br /> January 23. The Planning Board's recommendation will be presented to the Board <br /> of Commissioners at its February 6 meeting. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. <br /> G. ITEMS FOR DECISION - REGULAR AGENDA 1. ENO RIVER MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (A copy <br /> • of the agreement is in the permanent agenda file in the Clerk's Office). <br /> Manager John Link explained that Orange Alainance has endorsed this agreement and <br /> the Town of Hillsborough and Piedmont Minerals will be considering endorsement in the <br /> .near future. . <br /> Commissioner Willhoit suggested an amendment on page 2 of the agreement adding <br /> "and subsequent loss of local control" to the last WHEREAS. - <br /> Motion was made by Commissioner Hartwell, seconded by Commissioner Willhoit to <br /> approve the agreement as amended. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS. . <br /> . . <br /> '- ' 2.—COMPREHENSIVE REZONINGS FOR CHEEKS AND ENO TOWNSHIPS' <br /> -:--> <br /> Planner Gene Bell gave background information stating that amendments to the <br /> • land use element of the comprehensive plan were adopted on July 5, 1988 for Cheeks, <br /> Hillsborough, Eno and North Chapel Hill' Township. To promote consistency between the <br /> • adopted amendments and the Zoning Atlas, proposed rezonings were presented at the <br /> • public hearing on August 22. On October 18, the rezonings were approved for <br /> _Hillsborough and Chapel Hill Townships. Additional information was requested by the <br /> — <br /> Board on Cheeks and Eno Townships. That information has been provided. <br /> . -. -- <br /> The Administration recommend approval of the comprehensive rezonings as <br /> presented on October 18, 1988 with the following exceptions: <br /> • . (1) The area bounded by Efland-Cedar Grove Road, McGowan Creek, Upper Eno WQCA, <br /> and Lebanon Road should retain the existing zoning (El), and (2) Scattered commercial <br /> parcels outside the Commercial-Industrial Activity Nodes in Cheeks and Eno Townships <br /> currently zoned NC-2 and GC-4 should be rezoned to EC-5 consistent with the County . <br /> Attorney's December 12, 1988 legal opinion. <br /> .: '. Cyrus Hogue, attorney for Johnny Kennedy, referred to comments that Mr. Kennedy <br /> made at the public, hearing supporting his request that his property' remain GC-4. If- <br /> the 'property is rezoned, Mr. Kennedy would not be able to expand his business and his <br /> property would have greater controls placed on it. ' <br /> . In response to a question from Chair Carey, Bell explained the rationale for the <br /> • • recommendation for the Kennedy property. - <br /> - Commissioner Halkiotis_stated that he visited Mr. Kennedy's business and he _ <br /> - warehouses and wholesales spare parts for school buses. He asked about the impacts on <br /> -this business if it is rezoned. Attorney Gledhill stated that since Mr. Kennedy's <br /> - business will not be listed on the permitted use table for EC-5, he would not be <br /> permitted to expand his business as a mail order house. He suggested that the <br /> permitted use table be reviewed for possibly adding this type of business in that zone. <br /> Marvin Collins clarified that given the uses for EC-5, Mr. Kennedy's property <br /> • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.