Orange County NC Website
. _ <br /> PAGE 7 <br /> MINUTES 4 <br /> PUBLIC BEARING- inINUTES 2/2F/8q . • - . <br /> . . <br /> • ' . . <br /> 1 Chairman Carey pointed out that he would not have to do an environmental impact <br /> statement unless the assessment had been done and he corrected the statement <br /> indicating the section under discussing is on the Environmental Impact Statement. <br /> 4 . . <br /> 3 . <br /> 5 Wade Parrish, Orange County citizen, spoke in opposition to the Environmental <br /> 7 Impact Ordinance. He disagreed with the entire proposal. He believes the state is <br /> 3 taking care of regulating these matters and they do not need to be duplicated by <br /> 9 Orange County. . . - . . . <br /> • . <br /> . . . . ... . . .. <br /> l ': -:1'. • — • •: . <br /> * • • . <br /> ••.• • . • <br /> 2 _1-::.---% A motion was made by Chairman Carey, seconded by Commissioner Marshall, to refer <br /> 3 this item to. the Planning Board, This Public Hearing will remain open to receive <br /> 4. written comments until March 13th, which is a week before the Planning Board meets. <br /> 5 . This matter will be returned to the Board of Commissioners no sooner than April 3rd. <br /> • . <br /> 7.• VOTE: UNANIMOUS. . <br /> 8 . <br /> 3 : 3. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS . <br /> 0 a. /.LUP-1-89 Land Use Element - Section 4.0 Plan Categories-Zoning <br /> District Matrix- <br /> 2 . . • • . .- The presentation was made by Marvin Collins. In summary this item is to <br /> 3 • receive citizen comment on a proposed amendment to Section 4.0 of the Land Use Element <br /> 4 ' of the Comprehensive Plan.. . The proposed amendment would revise Section 4.0 of the <br /> 8...- Land Use Element. to:' :, ::,..... : .. . : , _ , . . • . <br /> . . . <br /> . , <br /> t : . . . <br /> :°.::-.-..-:-F:::: '"-'-::'.-1, 1.`:2-„ RefleCt,tha zoning of Cheeks Township: . . .. , .. .. . . • <br /> Ir";,. ...- ...,.--.-.1.-: 2:.:::'Reflect the adoption of zoning plans for Chapel Hill and. Carrboro <br /> 1":- Transition Areas'. - - ..- . - • . - . " .. • • <br /> . ... . • <br /> _. ....,,:-.,.,% ..-._:.-f- . . , . . <br /> 8..7..-.-:::.-,..--.:%Y...,;',. 3:"... Reflect the application of the Rural Buffer zoning district and . • • <br /> ;0 - ,...,:-, ..-' associated development standards to the Rural Buffer area designated . <br /> 11 :- ..: . ,.. . ...' '. ' - on the Joint Planning Land Use Plan; and . . . . <br /> 4::- Reflect proposed amendments to the Zoning Ordinance text and atlas <br /> :" establishing.and applying two distinct Public Interest District Zoning . <br />, :4 :-.. .•• . ' ' . •- " , •district designations.- - PID-1 and PID-2. <br /> .. . . • <br /> 35 • .' • - . .... <br /> • <br /> .... .,.. . <br /> 56 '.. NO COMMENTS WERE MADE •-.... .-.. • . . . <br /> -. . .• <br /> . • • <br /> 37 • . . <br /> • <br /> 38 • . <br /> . . . . <br /> . . . • <br /> .. .. .. <br /> 39 ... . .. A motion was made by Commissioner Hartwell, seconded by Commissioner Marshall to <br /> 40.-.;:referthis item to the Planning Board for a 'recommendation to be returned to the Board <br /> 41-" of CommissiOners no sooner than April 3, 1989. . • . <br /> 42..F,'••••-,2.• ' • '. .: - . . • - • - • • • <br /> ,, ........ . ... .- . - . . . . . . <br /> - 3 , VOTE: UNANIMOUS . . •• . . . . <br /> - - . <br /> • <br /> ... . . <br /> 44-::::',.• '---. _ -: -• , - • . . . . . . <br /> . . . • • <br /> . <br /> b. IUP-2-89 Activity Node 1-2 - Eno Township - See also Item # D.5.e . • <br /> . . . . . <br /> 46:-iT'-': :: • (Rural Residential to 20-Year Transition) .:.- . . ' • <br /> 47'::::-..:" - --. ---- The presentation was made by Planner David Stancil:, In summary this item <br /> 48- is to receive citizen comment on a proposed amendment to the Land Use Element of the . <br /> 49 .Comprehensive Plan. The area in question contains six lots and a portion of another <br /> 50 north of the Interstate .85/0.S. 70 interchange in eastern Eno Township near the Durham <br /> 51, County Line. The 25.44-acre area, fronts on Interstate 85, however, it is accessed <br /> 52 through Laurel Ridge Road and. Pleasant Green Road. The Eno River is located less than <br /> 53 1/4-mile to the north. The proposed amendment, if approved, would change the Land. Use <br /> 54 • <br /> 55 . . <br /> 56 <br /> 57 . . <br /> 58 <br />