Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
82 <br /> ft <br /> preserved. <br /> 9UESTTONABLE. It is questionable whether lot sizes of those <br /> characterizing Montvale can be considered "rural." <br /> URBAN FORM <br /> 1) A compact form of development should be achieved avoiding <br /> urban sprawl. (OC) <br /> 2) The urbanizing areas of the Towns are the major growth <br /> centers of the Township. . . (CH) <br /> Not applicable. The focus of the subdivision is Durham, <br /> rather than Chapel Hill. <br /> UTILITY ENTERS/0N <br /> 1) The timing of utility extensions and the pace of growth <br /> should be coordinated. (CH) <br /> 2) Water and sewer service should not be extended outside <br /> the boundaries of the Joint Planning Area. (CH) <br /> QUESTIONABLE. Although, on its face, the amendment does nots <br /> 'seem incompatible with the policies, it raises the questions <br /> of pacing in regards to infrastructure extensions from the <br /> City of Durham. <br /> The amendment ois ppo sedwater incompatible <br /> and sewer with <br /> r�extensions�iuto Rill <br /> the <br /> policy which <br /> Rural Duffer. <br /> ALLOCATION OF GRONNTE <br /> 1) Areas where public facilities and services are available <br /> should be developed before such areas where services are <br /> not yet available. (CH) <br /> COMPLIES. The subdivision receives sewer from the City of <br /> Durham. <br /> 2) To the maximum extent feasible, no "spillover" growth <br /> from the two Towns will occur in Chatham or Durham <br /> Counties or in Bingham Township. (OC) <br /> Not applicable. The development does not seem to be <br /> "spillover" in nature. <br /> 3) The area north of Town is assumed to be the most <br /> suitable for absorbing spillover because of <br /> 9 . <br />