Orange County NC Website
April 6, 1989 <br /> Orange County Commissioners <br /> Chapel Hill Town Council <br /> Carboro Town Council <br /> Planning Board Members <br /> Dear Commissioners, Councilmen, and Planners: <br /> The Stoneycreek Neighborhood Association (SNA) called a meeting 3 weeks ago <br /> to discuss the proposed Land Use Plan changes and has asked me to present <br /> the following unanimous concerns. <br /> We are surprised you are even having this public hearing to consider changes <br /> to the Land Use Plan. You and the community worked together almost 3 years <br /> to craft a Land Use Plan that guarantees the organized and logical <br /> development of Southern Orange County. We expected this plan to be a zoning <br /> guideline for at least 5 to 10 years. Now, in less time than it took to <br /> craft the original plan, changes are being considered. If the plan is going <br /> to be changed so quickly for small pocket interests, then it ceases to be a <br /> Land Use Plan and simply becomes an extension of the zoning process. <br /> We want to address the proposed land use changes for the Rural Buffer at the <br /> I-40 and New Hope Church Road interchange. The Rural Buffer is a bold and <br /> brilliant component of the Joint Land Use Plan. We know you worked hard to <br /> establish the Buffer. You have even hired consultants this year to find <br /> ways to strengthen and enhance the Rural Buffer. Any changes proposed for <br /> the Rural Buffer should be designed to strengthen and enhance it. However, <br /> the changes that have been proposed tonight do not strengthen the Rural <br /> Buffer. They punch a hole in the middle of it at its most vulnerable point. <br /> If approved, we are afraid these changes will be the initial leak that will <br /> destroy the dyke. <br /> If you must consider threatening the fabric of the Rural Buffer, it should <br /> be for the sake of an urgent requirement that benefits a significant portion <br /> of the county and that can be located nowhere else. However, the changes <br /> that you have presented tonight fall way short of being urgent, benefiting a <br /> significant portion of the county, or being unlocatable elsewhere. <br /> We, the members of the Stoneycreek Neighborhood Association urge you to <br /> consider two points: <br /> (1) Only change the Land Use Plan on a 5 to 10 year cycle. With any <br /> more frequent cycle, you cease to have a true plan. <br />