Orange County NC Website
Hon. Moses Carey, Chairman <br /> February 27, 1989 <br /> Page 5 <br /> actually "taken." If the shoreline of the Seven Mile Reservoir is <br /> calculated to be 10 miles, this would represent an additional strip <br /> of land 10 miles long and 50 feet wide that would have to be dealt <br /> with in terms of some form of severance damage. To give you some <br /> idea of the quantity involved, this would represent approximately <br /> 60 acres in some form of severance damage that would have to be <br /> dealt with. <br /> Since the Water Quality Critical Area overlay already protects <br /> the public concern, there is no need to put the public to potential <br /> extra expense when it is not necessary. The Water Quality Critical <br /> Area zoning will raise enough severance damage questions on its <br /> own. The public should not have to bear the expense of a PID-I <br /> buffer on top of it. <br /> Incidentally, we do acknowledge that the drafters of the <br /> proposed ordinance had the foresight to allow the Planning Director <br /> flexibility in waiving the width of the buffer requirement based <br /> on certain conditions being satisfied. After reviewing these <br /> conditions, however, we feel that they are quite narrow and relate <br /> primarily to the need to implement a septic system within the <br /> buffer. The legal consequences of the "taking" precipitated by the <br /> designation of the Seven Mile Creek site as PID-I are far broader <br /> than the stated exception adequately addresses. <br /> Summary. For all of the reasons set forth above, the Brown <br /> family respectfully requests the Board to withdraw its Seven Mile <br /> Creek site from the list of properties to be rezoned as a Public <br /> Interest District. The Brown family has no comment to make about <br /> the appropriateness of PID zoning in other portions of the county. <br /> With respect to its impact on the property owned by the Brown <br /> family, however, the family feels strongly that it would be <br /> legally, economically and practically unwise to make that <br /> designation. Since the County owns the property, it can always act <br /> at a later time. We commend to you a thorough study of all of the <br /> issues raised by this statement and hope, after you have read it, <br /> you will determine that this property should be withdrawn from the <br /> inventory of properties to be rezoned. <br />