Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-27-1989
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1989
>
Agenda - 02-27-1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2017 11:33:05 AM
Creation date
3/10/2017 10:52:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/27/1989
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
290
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
kEV• <br /> DISTRIBUTED /f, 3514 Bluestone Court EiVED <br /> • <br /> Chapel Hill, NC 27514 <br /> March 3, 1989 <br /> • • <br /> • <br /> Mr. Moses Carey, Chairman <br /> Orange County Board of Commissioners <br /> 106 East Margaret Lane <br /> Hillsborough, NC 27278 <br /> Dear Mr. Carey, <br /> • <br /> This letter is to express our concern over permitting the rezoning <br /> of the property on New Hope Church Road and Old_NC 10 from rural . . _ . <br /> residential to ten-year transitional. <br /> We are long term residents of Orange County and strongly support the <br /> Commissioner's plan to maintain and extend the rural buffer. And, <br /> because we are proponents of consistent residential growth, we <br /> advocate retaining the current rural residential zoning. <br /> We are already somewhat worried about the increased traffic if the <br /> land is developed as rural residential. Old NC 10 can be treacherous <br /> at bends and underpasses and New Hope Church Road will be the direct <br /> route to 1-40 past the new elementary school. <br /> We are strongly opposed to any urban growth that also yields gas <br /> stations, convenience stores, etc. We anticipate that rezoning <br /> would promote a "strip" connecting Durham and Hillsborough because <br /> of the proximity of this land to both cities! <br /> In summary, we oppose any development that would threaten the <br /> permanence of the rural buffer or the use of the Duke Forest lands. <br /> Sinc-rely, <br /> • _ . -ra -1) <br /> ars and Susan Knowles <br /> • <br /> 1 <br /> • <br /> • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.