Browse
Search
Agenda - 01-03-1989
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1989
>
Agenda - 01-03-1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2017 9:22:30 AM
Creation date
3/10/2017 8:51:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/3/1989
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
348
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
20 <br /> . _ <br /> done as necessary. <br /> The question was asked regarding who would be <br /> responsible for upgrading a private road if <br /> another day care center opened at a later time <br /> which generated more traffic than could be <br /> handled by the private road. Collins responded <br /> that this would be handled just like a <br /> subdivision that generated traffic increases; the <br /> day care center which generated the additional <br /> traffic would be the one responsible for any <br /> necessary upgrading of the private road unless <br /> this issue had been covered by a pre-existing <br /> Road Maintenance Agreement which included all <br /> property owners on the road. <br /> Jacobs asked where such a change would be listed <br /> to cover the change in number of children or any <br /> change that could require the updating of the <br /> Special Use Permit. Collins responded that a <br /> paragraph could be added after item e) as shown <br /> on the attached abstract to state: <br /> Each application shall be subject to annual <br /> review by the Orange County Planning Department <br /> to determine that the conditions of approval <br /> attached by the Board of Adjustment are complied <br /> with. <br /> MOTION: Best moved approval with the additions as <br /> suggested by Collins. Seconded by Eddleman. <br /> VOTE: Unanimous. <br /> d. Subdivision Regulations Text Amendments <br /> (1) Section III (New) - Application and <br /> Approval Procedure <br /> _ MOTION: - - - . Best moved approval as recommended by the <br /> Planning Staff with the effective date of <br /> February 1, 1989. Seconded by Dickinson. <br /> VOTE: Unanimous. <br /> • <br /> (2) Section V (New) - Specifications for Plat <br /> Drawings <br /> Best asked if the committee which included a <br /> representative from the Register of Deeds <br /> had approved the recording of a second document. <br /> Collins responded that they had and that the only <br /> thing to work on in that matter is the structure <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.