Browse
Search
Agenda - 01-03-1989
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1989
>
Agenda - 01-03-1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2017 9:22:30 AM
Creation date
3/10/2017 8:51:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/3/1989
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
348
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
im I [A <br /> Commissioner Marshall agreed with Commissioner Wilihoit <br /> and added that a substation is an obtrusive use and <br /> impacts are different in every case. She noted that she <br /> felt this is a logical use for which to require a <br /> Special Use Permit. <br /> Mike Parker, Counsel for Piedmont EMC, noted that the <br /> lines leading into the substations at the present time <br /> are all served by wooden poles and not tower structures . <br /> He noted that the proposed amendment would meet the <br /> needs of the power companies for substations in Orange <br /> County. He also noted that the Little River Substation, <br /> the most recently constructed by Piedmont, is an <br /> excellent example of how substations can be constructed <br /> • and screened so that they do not interfere with <br /> surrounding communities. He stated that the proposed <br /> amendment is one that has been agreed upon by Piedmont <br /> and the Planning Staff with the aid of the County <br /> Manager and County Attorney. <br /> There were no public comments. <br /> Motion was made by Commissioner Willhoit, seconded by <br /> Commissioner Marshall to refer this item to the Planning Board for a <br /> recommendation to be brought back to the Board of Commissioners no <br /> sooner than January 3, 1989. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS. <br /> b. Article 9 - Permitted Signs (Industrial Development <br /> Signs) <br /> The presentation was made by Eddie Kirk. <br /> A proposal was submitted by the Meadowlands to amend <br /> signage requirements in the I-1 Industrial Zone. The <br /> requested changes pertain to signs permitted in the - - <br /> Major Transportation Corridor, sign setbacks and square <br /> footage, and the addition of a provision for entrance • <br /> signs to industrial developments. <br /> • The requests were reviewed by- the Planning Staff- and • - <br /> _ <br /> _ Ordinance Review Committee and recommendations are <br /> provided. <br /> •, <br /> The requested change is to increase the maximum number <br /> - - of signs, allowed in.the Major. Transportation Corridor <br /> _ <br /> - from 2 to 4, or increase the square footage permitted- <br /> • for directional signs. from 4_to 9 square feet. • <br /> This increase from 2 to 4 signi' in the Major <br /> Transportation Corridor appears to be excessive based on <br /> other ordinances in nearby counties. The increase in <br /> size for directional signs is also excessive Wake County <br /> allows a 4 square foot directional sign and Durham <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.